Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: The new Nikkor VR lens hands-on

  1. #1

    Default The new Nikkor VR lens hands-on

    Hi guys,

    I know that the new *take a deep breath* AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED was shipped in limited numbers until next month or later. I was one of the lucky that has been able to get it. For the past week, I have a great time snapping with this sweet lens.

    If any of you who are interested to try it out with your own camera, I can meet you guys at the SEED. I am not free every Wednesday evening; Iíll do my best to be in the food court at 6.15pm sharp, whilst having my dinner you all can play with it, I must leave for my appointment by 7.15pm.

    BTW this will be my first SEED, so be nice to me please.

    Until then, take care!



    PS. Please don't ask me how much I paid for it. There was two shops got the lens with two different price tag. I will bring my TC-20E II along.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    5,499

    Default

    i'm there!!!!!!!

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    209

    Default

    Have you tried the lens?

    Originally posted by Larry
    i'm there!!!!!!!

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    407

    Default

    Originally posted by pcman
    Have you tried the lens?
    i've tried the lens, woo .. it's lovely, sweetness.

  5. #5
    Member Knighthunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
    Posts
    958

    Default

    Originally posted by Viewfinder
    i've tried the lens, woo .. it's lovely, sweetness.
    Feel the difference in AF speed? Smoooth and faaassstt........
    W204FL

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    209

    Default

    just call my bank for my account balance hehehe

    Any pic taken for a view.

    Originally posted by Knighthunter
    Feel the difference in AF speed? Smoooth and faaassstt........

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Frankly, the difference in AF speed is noticeable but it's not all that dramatic. The older lens was good enough for everything you could probably want to throw at it AF wise. Many of my colleagues still use the one touch AF-D. These days it's more the AF intelligence that's the problem rather than drive issues.

  8. #8

    Default

    MashiMaro
    Thanks for letting us try out the lens. Amazing and cool...especially the VR very useful....

    Thanks again

  9. #9
    Member Knighthunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
    Posts
    958

    Default

    Originally posted by Jed
    Frankly, the difference in AF speed is noticeable but it's not all that dramatic. The older lens was good enough for everything you could probably want to throw at it AF wise. Many of my colleagues still use the one touch AF-D. These days it's more the AF intelligence that's the problem rather than drive issues.
    The biggest difference is in AF tracking speed, I tried to track moving subject (a jogger) at Macritchie reservoir then I compared to my 80-200 f2.8 two touch tracking same subject......I feel big difference (at least to me).
    W204FL

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    407

    Default

    Originally posted by Knighthunter
    Feel the difference in AF speed? Smoooth and faaassstt........
    yup, u bet. Before I notice or hear anything, it's AF Lock On.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Originally posted by Knighthunter
    The biggest difference is in AF tracking speed, I tried to track moving subject (a jogger) at Macritchie reservoir then I compared to my 80-200 f2.8 two touch tracking same subject......I feel big difference (at least to me).
    Well I can honestly track a jogger just as well with an AF-D as I can the AF-S or the new VR. All of them would do it flawlessly although the AF-D would appear to be more jerky.

    There is a big difference in "feel" between that and the two touch AF-D, I'm not saying there is. I was comparing between the AF-S 80-200 and the 70-200, there is also a difference there.

    But like I said, the major factor these days is the AF intelligence, not the drive speed.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    5,499

    Default

    yah, thanks MashiMaro for letting us get our grubby hands on that piece of glass. it's very, very nice. just trying to figure out the pros it has over the AFS 80-200.

    weight and the VR comes immediately to mind, optics wise i can't comment (still gotta develop the half-roll i snapped off on it). the rest seems pretty similar to the AFS 80-200.

  13. #13
    Moderator sebastiansong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,556
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Thnx to MashiMaro for brought the lens and let everyone have a good time getting a feel of it. I managed some candids

    http://www.pbase.com/image/14223028

    http://www.pbase.com/image/14223031

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Behind the viewfinder...
    Posts
    5,851

    Default

    Sweet lens....

    really fast AF and image lock with VR.
    *Amous, post the photos leh*

    sigh.. if only Canon would launch a cheap promo set for the EF70-200 f2.8L IS USM....

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Somewhere Out There
    Posts
    2,571

    Default

    I guess now that Nikon has released its answer to the Canon EF70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, I guess it would really really be a good fight for both lenses from now on...

    BTW, I do own the 70-200 f/2.8L IS and I do have to admit that it is worth every dollar that I have paid for.

    CANON RULES...CANON RULES....

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default

    Troll, *SMACK* , Go away.

    For those interested, I've posted two links for the review on the above in the Nikon forum.

  17. #17
    Member Knighthunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pigeon Hole in Mandalay
    Posts
    958

    Default

    Here some images comparison between 70-200VR+2xTC and 80-400VR at 400mm end with VR on. These pic are cropped at center section.
    Images are courtesy of Mashimaro, he took this pics at Macrithie Reservoir. Look closely and the image speak for itself, setting I am not sure. May be Mashimaro can give me the shutter speed and ISO setting since I lost the EXIF data after I download from my e-mail (strange).

    At f5.6

    70-200VR+2x TC


    80-400VR


    At f8
    70-200VR+2x TC


    80-400VR


    I attached wrong Image sequence, now all images are correct at their position.
    Last edited by Knighthunter; 13th March 2003 at 12:36 PM.
    W204FL

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Behind the viewfinder...
    Posts
    5,851

    Default

    looks pretty good @ f8.0

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    407

    Default

    Originally posted by SniperD
    looks pretty good @ f8.0
    yup, tat's rite


  20. #20

    Default

    Good effort, thanks for posting the images. The images at f8 is telling. AFS70-200VR + TC20E is a good combination compared to 80-400VR. Prob get lens from HK. Too high a price here. Thanks knighthunter n mashimaro.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •