ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43)

Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43) Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Discussions


 
Thread Tools
Old 6th April 2007   #1
MarcusK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 266
Default FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Dear all,
Just a short introduction of myself, I'm a new owner of a brand new Olympus E500 DSLR and also my 1st DSLR camera since the day I'm start taking photos during sec sch days.
Personally a bit lost touch in photograhy. Currently I'm working and have my own income, I've decided to invest on one DSLR to fullfill my childhood dreams of capturing memorable moments.
Anyway, right now, with the full kit available, what I notice is lack of a decent flash to complete my collection. But on the other hand, I'm certain of which flash is preferred. Also the market price for these 2 model flash.
I wonder if anyone could assist me.
Please advise. All your generous comments and feedback will be very much appreciated.
Thx!!
__________________
start of journey to great photos with my 1st personal DSLR - E500 2nd DSLR - E1
MarcusK is offline  
Old 8th April 2007   #2
Kid Shotter
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 250
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Buy a FL50,FL36 u will upgrade one day.
Kid Shotter is offline  
Old 8th April 2007   #3
wind30
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

you should post this in the four thirds forum. Not many oly DSLR user frequent this forum.

The main adv for the FL50 is the recharge is much faster than the FL36.
wind30 is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 16th April 2007   #4
wrx_sti_22b
Senior Member
 
wrx_sti_22b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: where Bill is...
Posts: 3,627
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

FL50 cost $650 new... FL30 is something like $340 i think...
wrx_sti_22b is offline  
Old 16th April 2007   #5
halcy0n
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 442
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

I use the FL-36 and passed the FL-50 because of the price. Have not had personal experience with the FL-50 but I find the FL-36 pretty sufficient in terms of range and the recharge cycle is acceptable as well. Have tried taking pics for an event with the FL-36 and the recharge cycle was sufficient to take most shots I wanted to. I was using 1600mah rechargeable batt and the recharge cycle got real slow later but I think a higher powered batt or using non-rechargeable batt might last longer....
halcy0n is offline  
Old 16th April 2007   #6
casey4355
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 735
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by halcy0n View Post
I use the FL-36 and passed the FL-50 because of the price. Have not had personal experience with the FL-50 but I find the FL-36 pretty sufficient in terms of range and the recharge cycle is acceptable as well. Have tried taking pics for an event with the FL-36 and the recharge cycle was sufficient to take most shots I wanted to. I was using 1600mah rechargeable batt and the recharge cycle got real slow later but I think a higher powered batt or using non-rechargeable batt might last longer....
i jus did a wedding on FL-50, and wished recycling time was faster bcos my cam would not fire if the flash is not recharged. i replace the batteries b4 every scene where i think i need to shoot fast.
casey4355 is online now  
Old 16th April 2007   #7
tunghk
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upp Bukit Timah
Posts: 178
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

My personnal advise is that if you require faster flash recycle time in your shooting, then you have to go for the FL-50, if not then I think the FL-36 is more cost effective as it cost about half the price.

A point to note here, I have tried shooting my brother's wedding dinner with the FL-50 and found that the recycle time is not that fast as well, so the FL-36 I presume will be much worst off.
tunghk is offline  
Old 16th April 2007   #8
thevar
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 38
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by tunghk View Post
My personnal advise is that if you require faster flash recycle time in your shooting, then you have to go for the FL-50, if not then I think the FL-36 is more cost effective as it cost about half the price.

A point to note here, I have tried shooting my brother's wedding dinner with the FL-50 and found that the recycle time is not that fast as well, so the FL-36 I presume will be much worst off.
Hi, I use FL 50 on my E 300 for weddings, use 2700mah batteries,unicross,GP are good, after about 200-300 shots replace fresh batteries,I use bounce and 1-2 + intensity on flash. For me FL 50 works great!
thevar is offline  
Old 16th April 2007   #9
thevar
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 38
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by thevar View Post
Hi, I use FL 50 on my E 300 for weddings, use 2700mah batteries,unicross,GP are good, after about 200-300 shots replace fresh batteries,I use bounce and 1-2 + intensity on flash. For me FL 50 works great!
Additional tip always use freshly charged batteries and charged batteries kept unused there will be a drop in voltage over period of 2 to 3 days and more.
thevar is offline  
Old 17th April 2007   #10
kenjii
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

thanz thevar for tip, yeap i discover dat also recently,

cheers;
kenjii
kenjii is offline  
Old 19th April 2007   #11
MarcusK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 266
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Thx for all the advise. I think my choice is going for a budget FL 36 for now. Anyone selling a second hand FL 36? can PM me.
Thx!!
__________________
start of journey to great photos with my 1st personal DSLR - E500 2nd DSLR - E1
MarcusK is offline  
Old 19th April 2007   #12
Blu-By-U
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Selangor D.E.
Posts: 1,417
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Just go to the Buy sell section of Club Snap then advance search "Olympus"
__________________
World thru my lens
Blu-By-U is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #13
selamatlzh
Gallery Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sinagpore
Posts: 849
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by tunghk View Post
My personnal advise is that if you require faster flash recycle time in your shooting, then you have to go for the FL-50, if not then I think the FL-36 is more cost effective as it cost about half the price.

A point to note here, I have tried shooting my brother's wedding dinner with the FL-50 and found that the recycle time is not that fast as well, so the FL-36 I presume will be much worst off.
Actually base on my personal experience with the 2 flash. Their RECYCLING TIME are quite the same. Though FL 50 is more powerful thats all that might help is some situation. The only way to bring down the recycle time on fl50 is to buy the original batt pack or 3rd party one. Hope that helps.
selamatlzh is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #14
selamatlzh
Gallery Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sinagpore
Posts: 849
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Consider metz..... Made in germany, half the recycling time without gimmicks. Can also use on other brand if you decide to switch system or sell it away. For the same or lesser than fl50 price.
selamatlzh is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #15
Mikefellh
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,460
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by selamatlzh View Post
Consider metz..... Made in germany, half the recycling time without gimmicks. Can also use on other brand if you decide to switch system or sell it away. For the same or lesser than fl50 price.
But they're NOT 100% compatible with Olympus TTL...I have used Metz in the past, but use an FL-36 with my E-300 (for 18 months) because of that.
Mikefellh is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #16
microcosm
Moderator
 
microcosm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,004
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

TTL is not totally important in flash photography... I was with a Nikon SB28DX set on auto for the longest time, and till today, it has never failed me. So you can safely consider the Metz... but I believe they are working for full Olympus compatibility anyway...
microcosm is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #17
Mikefellh
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,460
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by microcosm View Post
TTL is not totally important in flash photography...
I never said it was...personally I use monolights via a PC cord all the time. But for the beginner who doesn't want to fool with setting shutter speeds and apertures on the camera every time they use the flash, or never used anything other than Program, Scene, or AUTO modes TTL is a benefit...personally I recommend things that I KNOW will work without problem.
Mikefellh is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #18
microcosm
Moderator
 
microcosm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,004
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by casey4355 View Post
i jus did a wedding on FL-50, and wished recycling time was faster bcos my cam would not fire if the flash is not recharged. i replace the batteries b4 every scene where i think i need to shoot fast.
Originally Posted by tunghk View Post
My personnal advise is that if you require faster flash recycle time in your shooting, then you have to go for the FL-50, if not then I think the FL-36 is more cost effective as it cost about half the price.

A point to note here, I have tried shooting my brother's wedding dinner with the FL-50 and found that the recycle time is not that fast as well, so the FL-36 I presume will be much worst off.
Originally Posted by selamatlzh View Post
Actually base on my personal experience with the 2 flash. Their RECYCLING TIME are quite the same. Though FL 50 is more powerful thats all that might help is some situation. The only way to bring down the recycle time on fl50 is to buy the original batt pack or 3rd party one. Hope that helps.
Bingo... that is exactly what I wanted to say... if one needs to have a little "machine gunning time", then the battery power pack is the way to go, the only solution at the moment. BUT be warned... machine gunning any camera mounted flash unit will shorten the lifespan of the flash unit considerably, as it heats up too much. Use with care. Afterall, this is not a studio flash (strobe).
microcosm is offline  
Old 21st April 2007   #19
microcosm
Moderator
 
microcosm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,004
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Originally Posted by Mikefellh View Post
I never said it was...personally I use monolights via a PC cord all the time. But for the beginner who doesn't want to fool with setting shutter speeds and apertures on the camera every time they use the flash, or never used anything other than Program, Scene, or AUTO modes TTL is a benefit...personally I recommend things that I KNOW will work without problem.
Yes, you are so right about that my friend. I forgot, for a moment, that there are still many shooters out there who are using DSLRs as a PnS camera on steroids. My bad.
microcosm is offline  
Old 23rd April 2007   #20
MarcusK
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 266
Default Re: FL36 or FL50 for normal shooting

Thx!!
__________________
start of journey to great photos with my 1st personal DSLR - E500 2nd DSLR - E1
MarcusK is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13355 seconds with 7 queries