![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 318
|
hi guys,
thinking of purchasing this scanner to digitise my slides (unmounted), b&w and normal colour negs. how's the performance for scanning slides? good? thinking of using this to scan my gf's 35mm pano taken with the holga, similar to the xpan format which uses 2 frames for a single shot. so is it able to select the areas for the two frames to scan into one image? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bogor - West Java
Posts: 77
|
there is a toolbar on top-left and click the thumbnail button Thumbnail Button Switches the display mode between the thumbnail view that is cropped to the frame size or the uncropped entire image view when a film is scanned (4200F is used as reference) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
|
has anyone tried to force it to scan medium format?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bogor - West Java
Posts: 77
|
unless you modify the film mounting, or in general the top side, the 4 thousands series cant
Last edited by ifirdauzi; 11th April 2007 at 07:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
|
hmm, if thats all it takes, i might just give it a shot. I really need a cheap/budget med format scanner.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 49
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 33
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
|
heh, i'm abroad at the moment, where the 4400 is going for about $150 and the 8600F a lot more than that so its a bit harder.....
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In God's Top Ten
Posts: 2,249
|
Hi, I'm really new to this. But what's the output from the 4400 for 135 scanning ... like in terms of number of pixels? It really blows to not be able to find anywhere that does scans with a decent resolution here. The best there is 4-base scanning which produces a measly 1500+ by 1000+ pixel image which isnt' sufficient for my purposes.
So I am considering purchasing a scanner on my next trip back to SG and bringing it over. heh.
__________________
my PBase(new) Last edited by Yatlapball; 26th April 2007 at 12:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SengKang
Posts: 205
|
For the number of pixel: u can roughy calculate based on the spec given: number of effective pixel = 4800dpi x 2.54 in. Thus, the numner of pixels will depend on what res u used to scan. It will definitely more than 1500px at the basic 2400dpi scanning. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In God's Top Ten
Posts: 2,249
|
From what I gathered off the net. 4-base and 16-base are scanning modes on a Fuji Frontier machine.
Basically a 4-base scan of the 135 format would produce a 1037 x 1536 file and a 16-base scan produces 2432 x 3637
__________________
my PBase(new) |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SengKang
Posts: 205
|
Interesting question so I did some searching. After much research, I found that we have an misunderstanding. The confusion is calrified by www.vicgum.asn.au/imageformats.pdf (page 3)
4-base and 16-base are image format. (page 3) Normally, I saved my image in tiff (lossless). The resolution is selectable in the scanner to meet your desired output. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|