![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 250
|
I was going through some very old slides that I had taken many years back. Most of them already faded in colour.
Then an idea dawn on me. Instead of throwing them away, I had a little fun experiment... The actual shots were taken with a Sigma 70-210 f2.8. Placing the slides against a light box, I used my Tamron 90mm Macro to duplicate them. After some processing, here are the results. Any comments? Good enough? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,977
|
looks nice to me. just abit saturation makes it like a real digital picture.
Last edited by satay16; 30th March 2007 at 12:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sengkang
Posts: 2,476
|
Not bad. Guess I should try some of my old slides liao.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: cockroach-infested parsee lees
Posts: 1,331
|
a friend of mine converted a DRAWER into one
![]() just add flourescent tubes below a translucent acryllic sheet and voila... works very well with his slides collection.
__________________
Many are culled, few are chosen |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sengkang
Posts: 2,476
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: cockroach-infested parsee lees
Posts: 1,331
|
the coolest part is slide out = on, slide back in = off. all via contact switch, no need to fumble with switches, and best of all keeping it is a simple sliding act.
__________________
Many are culled, few are chosen |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sengkang
Posts: 2,476
|
you, me & satay boy seems to be 'switching' from one thread to another huh?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: cockroach-infested parsee lees
Posts: 1,331
|
![]()
__________________
Many are culled, few are chosen |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 250
|
I used to have a Nikon Coolscan II. But the scanning process is painfully slow and it takes forever to clean up the dust and scratches. So, finally gave it up.
I think this whole exercise is to show what can be done with relative ease and at no extra cost.(i.e. if you already own a Macro lens.) The results are definitely not as good as a proper scan pic but good enough for Webs or A4 print. While going through the slides, what I really miss is the narrower DOF the FF offer. So, really a disadvantage in one situation could be an advantage in another, depending on what type of effect you’re after. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 270 degree of Singapore
Posts: 6,700
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 124
|
Alternatively, if you don't own a copystand, put the photo on the floor by your window on a bright day, then either using a tripod or just by standing over the photo, position your camera directly over the photo and shoot. You'll get the same effect. In colour negs, there are more things you can play around with as compared to slides, in terms of exposure and contrast. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
Hi, colour look a bit false...
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 250
|
Those slides were taken over ten years ago and had developed an orangey cast. I had to process them a bit.
But even if the slides are new, I can assure you that they look rather different from digital. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|