Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bukit Panjang
    Posts
    791

    Default Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set

    Anyone has actually bought this set? This macro set offers lower diopters of +5 compared to RAYNOX MSN-202 Super Macro Lens which gives +25. The prices for the former costs 3 times more than the the latter. I'm confused by which would be a better choice since one seems to offer less magnification but at 3 times the cost of one which offers 5 times more magnification at a third of the former's price.

    For macro, isnt it always best to get the best magnification? If we wanted less, we could simply move further from the subject.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,751

    Default Re: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    Quote Originally Posted by ryuggen View Post
    Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set

    Anyone has actually bought this set? This macro set offers lower diopters of +5 compared to RAYNOX MSN-202 Super Macro Lens which gives +25. The prices for the former costs 3 times more than the the latter. I'm confused by which would be a better choice since one seems to offer less magnification but at 3 times the cost of one which offers 5 times more magnification at a third of the former's price.

    For macro, isnt it always best to get the best magnification? If we wanted less, we could simply move further from the subject.
    theres a limit to how far away you can focus... if its too huge you might be just taking part of a larger subject (eg. butterfly)

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bukit Panjang
    Posts
    791

    Default Re: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    Yup, I'm pretty worried about how far I can focus. As 5320 gives me a +5 diopter, its not as exciting as 250, which has 8. Yet, the price differences is 3 times difference...

    As I would like to mount 5320 on 18-200, I'm afraid it might not have enuff to stop down to give a clear focus on the subject totally. I noticed that macro shooters tend to focus on the face while the body is totally OOF. As my lens is not a macro lens, I'm afraid that I couldnt even achieve the basic focus.
    Last edited by ryuggen; 29th March 2007 at 09:52 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,751

    Default Re: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    Quote Originally Posted by ryuggen View Post
    Yup, I'm pretty worried about how far I can focus. As 5320 gives me a +5 diopter, its not as exciting as 250, which has 8. Yet, the price differences is 3 times difference...

    As I would like to mount 5320 on 18-200, I'm afraid it might not have enuff to stop down to give a clear focus on the subject totally. I noticed that macro shooters tend to focus on the face while the body is totally OOF. As my lens is not a macro lens, I'm afraid that I couldnt even achieve the basic focus.
    eh seriously if you do consider the 5320 (3x of 250 = $300?), might as well top up $300 more for a real macro lens.
    image from a 18-200 lens + close up filter cannot beat a true macro lens.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bukit Panjang
    Posts
    791

    Default Re: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    You are right! Thats the pulling factor. If 5320pro doesnt give me a good image quality, then, it wouldnt make sense to invest on it. And normal macro lens will have a filter size of 67mm or below. Thus, I could consider the cheaper alternative of 250 or 3500 series.

    I just thought perhaps 5320pro might give me a cheap macro lens on the wide and tele ends

    There are other options: extension tube and close up filter. Dedicated macro lens didnt cross my mind, as I wanted to shoot in wide and tele ends.
    Last edited by ryuggen; 30th March 2007 at 01:58 AM.

  6. #6

    Wink Re: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    Hi All,

    Think there's some misunderstanding on this DCR-5320PRO. It's quite a special lens really.

    The price is more affordable than a normal macro lens if your main concern is to save money. But you can also use it on a macro lens in future to make it more "macro". This investment will be put to good use anyway, either with a normal telephoto lens or macro lens.

    As for reviews, we're probably the first website in the world to offer a more comprehensive review other than Raynox site.
    http://www.mcgill.com.sg/shop/produc...products_id=96

    Pictures are taken with the Nikon 18-200VR so that people can decide if they are comfortable with the level of magnification made possible with this lens.

    Hope things are clearer now.

    Cheers,
    Jim, McGill.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Raynox DCR-5320PRO 3-in-1 Macro Lens Set queries

    i've actually done a review on the 3500. hope this little write up can help you

    http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=255905

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •