![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hobbitshire
Posts: 299
|
I noticed that most people are now doing digital IR shots... and was wondering if anyone here is doing an film IR shots?
I just got myself started with my first roll of IR yesterday, with a roll of Kodak HIE. Was hoping someone will be able to share some pointers? ![]() Here are some of the shots that were hand-processed in the darkroom and scanned with a film scanner: (PS. i wasn't shooting in Singapore...) #1 - Driveway leading up to Trinity College, Cambridge ![]() #2 - River Cam, Cambridge ![]() Apparent fogging probably due to the lens I was using - Nikon 18-35mm / F3.5-4.5 #3 - Garden at King's College, Cambridge ![]() Any comments and suggestions welcome! There are also more shots available at My Gallery. Not too many shots available as I've never shot in IR before and was bracketing most of the shots... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
hi,
I shot HIE and Konica 720 IR film before, now switch to digital. there are some unique character that only can get from film, but digital do have it advantage, here are some of my digital IR pix I like your first and second shots. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: www.irphotography.com
Posts: 1,377
|
some of your river cam photos are interesting
I've shot a roll of HIE before. I notice that in normal sun light, I just need to set to ISO400 and not much bracketing is needed |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hobbitshire
Posts: 299
|
thanks for the replies dudes...
i was shooting in ISO200 for this roll, and developed with Ilfosol S for 9:30...
any advice on filters? I tried a red filter on the Zenitar 16mm fisheye, but turned out foggy, possibly due to the lens. But I noted that the sky instead of being bright as it was without filter became dark instead with a red filter on.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
R25 filter work well on HIE.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,357
|
Cambridger? =D
Wa, I heard that IR film is a pain in the arse to handle. Or something like that. I like #1! IR actually makes water look solid when it's pretty still.. =D |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SG / LDN
Posts: 3,021
|
my HIE pics were all done with the hoya R72 so far....yet to try out R25 on HIE, though eawtan has lend me his hehe...
problem with r72 is..u wont be able to compose if u mount the filter on already. so its quite a hassle. a red filter solves this problem most definitely. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
btw, I still have 3 rolls of HIE, expired 2000, wanted to give away.
anyone interested? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
HIE has very short shelf life. think I will just use them myself to try it out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ark19.multiply.com
Posts: 3,080
|
Wah the 1st photo is very nice
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hobbitshire
Posts: 299
|
indeed, IR film is quite a pain to handle, although my first roll seemed to turn out fine. I loaded my film in "near" darkness and read that the film leader shouldn't be exposed to ANY light cos it acts as a light pipe, transmitting light to the rest of the film. but as it seems, i think it wasn't too bad.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: www.irphotography.com
Posts: 1,377
|
forget to mention that i used red filter too. I tried a few without any filter and it seems like normal b&w
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 664
|
what will the outcome be if I were to shoot on normal colour film with IR filter over the lens? anyone ever tried before?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
it will like unexposed film after you process it, cos the film it is not sensitive to IR waves.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 664
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
digital sensor is sensitive to all wave length, but since IR wave affect the image quality, so a "hot mirror" is installed to block out IR wave to improve image quality.
IR film is specially design, originally meant for medical study and military usage. it is sensitive all wave length and extend to IR wave 720 nm and above, that's why is it expensive and short shelf life. you can try to expose normal film till it get fog also would not record any IR wave. Last edited by catchlights; 2nd April 2007 at 09:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 664
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
you are welcomed.
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|