![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
These are the test shots from my US$15 sears 135mm f2.8. Shots are taken at f2.8 with ISO100.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Planet Gaia
Posts: 8,603
|
Cheap & good.
__________________
Good lens or Lousy lens also can't beat @ great photographer with kit lens - Galdor@Alphadslr |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,603
|
Pentax owners ought to congratulate themselves whenever nice pictures like this appear because it puts new meaning to DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY ON THE CHEAP.
Not only do these old lenses get a new lease of life but I can't help feeling users of other brands like C...., N...., O......, S..., etc. are suckered into paying A LOT OF MONEY for new lenses when old lenses like this work just as well and give great results. Newer ain't necessarily better. Obviously we must all keep this a secret if not the secondhand price of Pentax fit lenses will skyrocket. Pentax really does SAVE YOU MONEY... |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
MF is not as easy as I recalled
I'll need a better focus screen to get sharper image. Anyone got lobang for a good and "cheap" one?![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 528
|
just to nit pick, the 3rd and 5th pic macam got CA and the bokeh a bit messy...
but wot the hell... USD15 bucks for a 132/2.8! oh wait, does your lens shoot a fully open 2.8 all the time no matter wat your arperture is set to? I've got a cosina that behaves like this. Last edited by southernoise; 22nd March 2007 at 04:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
I can set the aperture by turning the ring. It's not open at 2.8 all the time, as the shutter do become slower as the aperture closes (f/2.8 - f/22) ![]() BTW anyway to improve the CA issue? I understand old lenses tends to have this problem
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif Last edited by longko; 22nd March 2007 at 04:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East side
Posts: 3,603
|
Adobe Camera Raw/Photoshop can correct the CA. Stopping down generally reduces lens aberrations.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
For those interested in this lens, here's a good package
http://cgi.ebay.com/AUTO-SEARS-MC-13...QQcmdZViewItem
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
A handheld test shot with Raynox DCR250 attached to it
Raw resized ![]() 100% cropped ![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
|
IMO the Sears which I believe was made by Cosina along with Vivitar 135mm f2.8's are superior to the much praised Pentax-M 135mm f3.5 which I did own and thought very little of. Since then I've acquired both the other brands and have liked the results. I can't comment about whether they are better than the Pentax 135mm f2.8 or the Takumar lenses as I haven't had any experience with those ones.
Nice sharp pics @ f2.8. Often lenses are quite soft at their max aperture setting. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
Sorry I didn't state, but these super macros are with f22.
![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
|
And I was referring to the pics in the original post.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,954
|
Hi there!
Great pics with cheap and good lens. Samething for me here.....bought a few M42 mount Aizer and Galaxyprince at very good rate. Guess what? Pics turn out to be quite sharp except that Manual focusing is alittle hard cos mine is not a spilt screen.I use with Raynox 3500 X24 produce super micro pics that really amaze me.......hope u enjoying your toy. Only thing i dun like is that if it's too bright, you tend to get the white wash effect Last edited by Stress; 23rd March 2007 at 05:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
Took the Sears out for a short walk in the park & took these shorts.
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,298
|
Nice shots longko....cheap and good lens!
For US$15, you can't even eat a dinner at a posh restaurant and yet the results for this lens is great! |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|