|
|
|
|||||||
| Sigma/Tamron/Tokina 3rd party lenses/flashes and accessories from Sigma, Tamron and Tokina. |
|
|
| View Poll Results: Tokina vs. sigma | |||
| Tokina ATX Pro 80-200 is better |
   
|
70 | 25.27% |
| Sigma EX 70-200 is better |
  
|
142 | 51.26% |
| non of the above ... errr dun tell me u prefer tamron. |
  
|
65 | 23.47% |
| Voters: 277. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
7th March 2002
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
A tokina 80-200 f/2.8 vs sigma 70-200 f/2.8
Which lens do u prefer???
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#2 |
|
ClubSNAP Admin
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ClubSNAP HQ
Posts: 7,473
|
prefer my Nikkor 80-200f/2.8
 |
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#3 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Snoopyland
Posts: 3,185
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
aiya... cheaper wan mar....
|
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
Hi,
Prefer my Nikkor AF 80-200 f2.8D ED. Only a bit more than the Sigma.  Obviously the AF-S is a different story altogether.  Regards CK |
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
wah liaoz... another rich man... kekeke
 |
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,262
|
Zoom Nikkor AF-n 80-200mm f/2.8D ED!!!!!
Last edited by YSLee; 7th March 2002 at 03:52 PM. |
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
seems like both about the same lens...
|
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#9 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,090
|
 |
|
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
50-500.... kaoz...
|
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,799
|
I wonder if the Sigma is HSM lens. If not...then I prefer OEM lens.
|
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 625
|
yes the sigma is a HSM. The tokina i believe its not...
|
|
|
|
7th March 2002
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
9th March 2002
|
#14 |
|
ClubSNAP Idol
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Jalan Suka
Posts: 5,321
|
Never used them before but I've heard good review concerning Sigma's offering...heard only har...dun quote me hor
|
|
|
|
9th March 2002
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: BB
Posts: 2,622
|
I will prefer Tokina. If I don't have an alternative, I will get Sigma lor.
|
|
|
|
9th March 2002
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,492
|
All those 80-200 AF-S owners all probably going to upgrade to the 'VR' version so just wait for the 2nd hand market
|
|
|
|
9th March 2002
|
#17 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
sold my nikon 80-200 f2.8 (push-pull) to get the sigma 80-200 f2.8. compared the 2 lens at aperture wide open and found the nikon one looks flat and the sigma is still looks quite good at 8R.
but is if its the tripod version or the AFS, then its a different story. |
|
15th November 2003
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 335
|
i tried a sigma 70-200/2.8 HSM version on a canon EOS300 and it was fast and silent. tried the tokina 80-200/2.8 on my D100 but it was rather slow and noisy...
never had a chance to try either the 80-200/2.8 AF-n or AF-S doubt i'd ever have the chance to own the 80-200AFS or 70-200VR so i'll just settle for the sigma HSM when i decide to get something in that focal range. actually wanted to get the tokina one all along coz of its build... but after trying it at CP that day...  |
|
|
|
15th November 2003
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 3,685
|
Better quality & build means more money...
 |
|
|
|
15th November 2003
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: DEATH*
Posts: 618
|
 Minolta AF 80-200 f2.8 APO G |
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
