ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Nikon

Nikon At the heart of the image


 
Thread Tools
Old 13th March 2007   #1
nikonrus
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 321
Default Cons of Plastic Bayonet?

I just found out that in recent years the kit lenses & some of the lower cost lens are all using plastic bayonet instead of metal.
How hardy is the plastic? Does it start 'marking' the moment you start to change your lens?

I know this is a bad request, but if there are worn down lines on those bayonets, can some please show me a pict of it? I wana seriously consider about this before I get any of the lower end lens.

Thanks
nikonrus is offline  
Old 13th March 2007   #2
sykestang
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: studiospace
Posts: 5,748
Default Re: Cons of Plastic Bayonet?

So far as I know, plastic lens mount only implemented to very very low end Nikkors which we see very often given off as a kit lens. For eg, AF 70-300G f/4.5-5.6, AF 28-80 f/3.5-4.5 etc. The plastic used are the hard thermal setting plastics. Thus it would not break nor marked easily. Although the bayonet mount is plastic, Nikon did not do injustice to optical quality. The above mentioned 2 lenses produces quite good sharp pictures and one would be surprise at their performance after feeling their actual weight on hand which is very very light.

However for one who really got 'scared' with plastic mount lenses, don't worry. As far as I know, even the cheap and very much affordable std lens like the AF50mm f/1.8 ($~170), which some ppl commented that this is a cheapo China made lens, does not come with these plastic mount. So I don't think this would be a concern to most photographers here. And should not be your worry also.

IMHO
sykestang is online now  
Old 14th March 2007   #3
calebk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
Default Re: Cons of Plastic Bayonet?

On longer lenses, having a plastic mount may be abit risky, because an untoward knock on any side of the lens barrel could possibly snap the entier mount. The 18-135 is one worrying example

On shorter lenses, it probably isn't such a bad thing. Weighs less too.
__________________
deviantART | fotologue
calebk is offline  
Old 14th March 2007   #4
zac08
Senior Member
 
zac08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,963
Default Re: Cons of Plastic Bayonet?

Originally Posted by calebk View Post
On longer lenses, having a plastic mount may be abit risky, because an untoward knock on any side of the lens barrel could possibly snap the entier mount. The 18-135 is one worrying example

On shorter lenses, it probably isn't such a bad thing. Weighs less too.
Eh...

I'm not really sure but when I was using the 70-300G lens (which had a plastic mount), I was holding the lens ONLY and cradling my D200 slightly... No issues there...
zac08 is offline  
Old 14th March 2007   #5
calebk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
Default Re: Cons of Plastic Bayonet?

Originally Posted by zac08 View Post
Eh...

I'm not really sure but when I was using the 70-300G lens (which had a plastic mount), I was holding the lens ONLY and cradling my D200 slightly... No issues there...
Generally speaking, even the plastic mounts that lensmakers offer are pretty strong, but I really wouldn't wanna do that. Haha.
__________________
deviantART | fotologue
calebk is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.06118 seconds with 7 queries