Quick comparison: Tokina 50-135mm vs. Sigma 50-150mm

[pianodancer]

With nightwolf75 permission, I used his test images and wrote a comparison review between Tokina 50-135mm f2.8 and Sigma 50-150mm f2.8.

http://portal.chester.sg/content/view/129/2/

To cut the story short, Sigma seems like a better (but more expensive) choice.

[kenkoh]

Thanks bro,

Good review.

[Scaglietti]

Nice comparison. Thank you!

This review by some Poles seems to conclude otherwise:
http://www.optyczne.pl/index.php?art=57&&roz=1

BC

[nightwolf75]

Originally Posted by Scaglietti Nice comparison. Thank you! This review by some Poles seems to conclude otherwise: http://www.optyczne.pl/index.php?art=57&&roz=1 BC

any fault with pianodancer's results and conclusions is mine.

[pianodancer]

Originally Posted by nightwolf75 any fault with pianodancer's results and conclusions is mine.

Haha dun say that it's your fault lah. Let the audience be the judge. Maybe it's an issue of good or bad copies. Afterall, Sigma is known to have either extremely good copies or extremely bad quality - QC issue.