i'm no geek and i never ever played DOTA...
HECK, i don't even know any new games that you young guys play! but one sure thing, life is a b****....... there are many issues that are linked...whether you like it or not.....its the MATRIX!
There are those who have chosen the red pill and will never see whats behind.
anybody need the codebreaker?
LOL! we are all OWNED.........
i m waiting to b bought over. thinking of selling part of myself on d Net.
start bid from $0.50.
If your father is the sole breadwinner of the family, and he does not earn much, chances are you will grow up with little money in your pocket too. However, if your father earns more, chances are that you will receive more as he will be able to afford you a better quality of life.
So the economy has EVERYTHING to do with how much you get, it's just that it's indirect. What is direct i.e. how much you CAN earn boils down to the personalchoices that you make to make that difference.
looking at those CNY sign they put at those lamp post.
why not 国泰民安 all they give a shi* is $.
To hell with the positive economic, the only different i see is paying more.
I refuse to put down any qualifications of mine on the table, because they will never be validated, and it's frankly pointless. Unless you want me to what, meet you and show you this cert or that cert? A bit boh liao right? So let's not drag qualifications into the story.
Note that I said personal wage. I admit it is not entirely ludicrous, perhaps it was merely a desire to drive home the point after no one acknowledged it. In any case, many jobs (I cannot give you solid figures since this is really based on quite a number of premises) would not have the renumeration based on how well the economy does. And even if a job's wage is adjusted up because of the economy, it isn't some "I peg your wage to economy" thing, i.e. the upwards translation would take some time to be reflected while the economic situation stabilises. Get what I mean?
A point to add, the civil servants bonuses are directly linked to the state of the economy.
Secondly, civil servants' bonus, yes, roughly linked. But once again, the time lag still exists, shrug.
This is a strong example of obvious misinformation, jeez. I do not want to bother telling you how blatantly wrong tat statement is. I don't think that is what the previous guy meant either, dude.
I wish it wasn't so.
I only know that I have nothing to fear, a clear and calm mind, and a positive attitude will generally serve one well throughout life, be it in Singapore, Africa or America. If one sits around to complain about everything that seems to be wrong in his life and uses emotional logic more than logcial logic, there is no speaking to him.
Gentlemen: I think both sides are correct.
We could probably have a consensus here, if we try using the famous distribution factor 80/20 to explain the problem.
If our economy consists of 10 people, we created and add $1000 to our GDP. If we divided it equally among the 10 people, each of us will collect $100. In this case, everyone feel that we have a fair share in the rising economy.
But in reality, wealth is never distributed equally and it never will.
2 people will share $800 and the other 8 people share the remaining $200.
Although the economy is good but the level of satisfaction among the 10 people is different. That is why, we have this problem here.