ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Marketplace > Consumers Corner

Consumers Corner Want to find out or give info on where, how much, how good, what to buy? Here is where you should be.


 
Thread Tools
Old 4th February 2007   #1
ReiszRie
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marsiling
Posts: 453
Default help needed > developing digital photos.

anyone knows of places which is able to develop digital sized photos (1024x768) with good quality?

i've been to a couple of Fujifilm developing outlets but the 4DSC prints are somewhat lacking in sharpness and accuracy, theres even significance difference between the photos developed from the 2 different outlets, one of them is acceptable but the other simply CMI.

So, i'm just wondering if theres any outlets around that has been tested and proven to develop good quality prints for digital sized photos.

thanks!
ReiszRie is offline  
Old 4th February 2007   #2
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,788
Default Re: help needed > developing digital photos.

Originally Posted by ReiszRie View Post
anyone knows of places which is able to develop digital sized photos (1024x768) with good quality?

i've been to a couple of Fujifilm developing outlets but the 4DSC prints are somewhat lacking in sharpness and accuracy, theres even significance difference between the photos developed from the 2 different outlets, one of them is acceptable but the other simply CMI.

So, i'm just wondering if theres any outlets around that has been tested and proven to develop good quality prints for digital sized photos.

thanks!
your pixel size too small, to have decent 4R_DSC print, minimum 250 dpi is needed, so you need at least 1125x1500, best is to have 300dpi, 1350x1800
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 5th February 2007   #3
ReiszRie
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marsiling
Posts: 453
Default Re: help needed > developing digital photos.

Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
your pixel size too small, to have decent 4R_DSC print, minimum 250 dpi is needed, so you need at least 1125x1500, best is to have 300dpi, 1350x1800
my photos are 300dpi but at 1024x768 for easier distribution.

so, what alternatives do i have?

do i need to PP my whole bunch of photos again in the above mentioned resolution?
ReiszRie is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 5th February 2007   #4
ReiszRie
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marsiling
Posts: 453
Default Re: help needed > developing digital photos.

and also, is RGB or CMYK recommended for prints?
ReiszRie is offline  
Old 5th February 2007   #5
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,788
Default Re: help needed > developing digital photos.

Originally Posted by ReiszRie View Post
my photos are 300dpi but at 1024x768 for easier distribution.

so, what alternatives do i have?

do i need to PP my whole bunch of photos again in the above mentioned resolution?
1024x768 for printing at 300dpi, the best you can get is in 2R print, 2½" × 3½"

Originally Posted by ReiszRie View Post
and also, is RGB or CMYK recommended for prints?
use sRGB,
CMYK is for off set printing, the lab won't be able to open your file.
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 5th February 2007   #6
megaweb
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,106
Default Re: help needed > developing digital photos.

As catchlights said, you need a min. resolution of 1350x1800 to print decent 4R_DSC prints.

To print 1024x768 resolution to photo quality (300 dpi), just divide 300 and you will get the size in inches

1024 x 768 / 300

= 3.41" x 2.56" only.
megaweb is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.06361 seconds with 7 queries