![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
Hello all,
Just wanna check with the fellow Canon users here with regards to the above mentioned lens at its widest end. I find the distortion is too much on my 1.3x body. How do you take care of it? I use mainly 24-70 when doing event but in certain situation, I have to use this lens due to the cramp of room. That's why when I mount this lens on, I am going to use 17mm-24mm for the wide. I will get the picture but on the other hand, at the edge of the picture I will see ugly distortion especially when I am taking people or group photos ( I see ET... ).Any advice from the experts? Wish everyone has a happy weekend! ![]() Regards CM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,282
|
I think ther eare some plugins for PS that can take care of distortions such as this...DXO optics and PTlens are a few of them..
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Teban Gardens
Posts: 2,610
|
I always try not to use the wide-end or even 24mm to do shoot group shots. The distortion can be very obvious if you're not careful.
I normally fix it by using the Pinch filter in Photoshop and later further massaging it by using the Warp tool. The best would be to use DxO optics as raptor84 mentioned but its going to be an expensive one. (IIRC its around 400 bucks) Hope that helps. Cheers! |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampines SG
Posts: 1,441
|
distortion is un avoidable if that wide.even if u correct it in the ps or any software ,the final image will still have a bit distortion, if not the image will be just like any true 28mm len image with all the extra corner being crop off.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Siglap
Posts: 1,645
|
I wouldn't use it at its widest on a 1.3 crop body. Even on a 1.6 crop, i'm already seeing a tad obvious amount of distortion.
Since you're the photographer, you should be able to reposition or "pack" your subjects tighter together so that you don't need to go that wide on a 1.3x crop.. probably the 28mm mark on a 17-40 should be alright. Its the same mistake i made last time when i shot group photos. Luckily, i still had room to crop and alter the photos. Last edited by dEthANGeL; 5th February 2007 at 01:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5,452
|
for me, when i'm shooting packed/crowded events, i just take the shot at 17mm, no questions asked.
__________________
the SEARCH FUNCTION is there for a reason. USE IT! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore, East Coast, Katong.
Posts: 388
|
I don't bother with the distortion, as long I get what I want within the frame.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 212
|
I found that the 17mm side distortion only happen on far subject.
I have tried 17mm at between 1.5 - 2M away from my subject without any distortion but around 2.5 onward the distortion start to appear.
__________________
Dear All, my English not that power so if I offend anyone I apologies. Last edited by Bern; 5th February 2007 at 10:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 586
|
may i ask how the 16-35 handles the distortion compared to the 17-40?
__________________
5D | 24-70L | 28mm f/1.8 | 580EX |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Strangely enough, theory seems to suggest that generally, distortion is more noticable on wide angle lenses at close distances than at long distances.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 3,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 96
|
one cost US$15 the other is in hundreds !!
what's the difference ? both seem to be doing the same job. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
Thanks guys for the valuable input.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 212
|
when I shot near to the person on the 17mm wide side the person on both side of the image look normal. but once I step back their face will look like hamburger liao.
__________________
Dear All, my English not that power so if I offend anyone I apologies. Last edited by Bern; 6th February 2007 at 10:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
I should really go test it out liao...
Thanks Bern. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 212
|
you're welcome, I will do more test on it as well and will update again.
__________________
Dear All, my English not that power so if I offend anyone I apologies. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
Best with picture because over here, no picture no talk. kekeke
Thanks thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 212
|
but how to post picture?
__________________
Dear All, my English not that power so if I offend anyone I apologies. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Singapore, Katong
Posts: 13
|
Quick Links > Subscribe
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|