![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| IR/UV Photography Seeing the world in a different light. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
Hi people...
Desperately trying to find a nice camera that can shoot IR well... Have been trying out with my Sony H1 with a 72 hoya filter, but the results are never sharp and almost always very red... Thinking about the Sony F717... anyone shooting IR with it? Do I have to mod or can I shoot IR with a 72 hoya and get clear shots like the ones that are posted here... really envious with some of your shots here... You can see the type I get through this thread... http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=244655 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SG / LDN
Posts: 3,045
|
u a sony fan?
the Sony F828 lor but abit ex...but confirm can shoot IR. same with the 717 or get a older Coolpix 990 or KM Dynax 7 and mod them ![]()
__________________
My Photos on Flickr Last edited by vortex; 30th January 2007 at 12:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,851
|
Does the Hi have Night Mode? If yes, try switching it on and shoot with the IR filter. Might Work. I know that it works with the F717.
Last edited by teerex; 30th January 2007 at 01:03 PM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,799
|
I believe for F717 and F828, if use Night Mode without modification, must use ND filters together with IR filter for IR shooting. Otherwise the resulting images would be grossly over-exposed.
__________________
Fish Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/oddballs IR Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/infra_red |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
I did a series of shots on a sunny day... Sadly I did not include any object in the foreground... so only the trees in the background and some running track to look at...
All shots not proposed... Shot with Sony H1 using Fine JPEG (best option... no TIFF or RAW) I feel that the shots with the filter on normally very noisy or blur... is that true? Which photo would you use to process in PS? Normal shot taken. f/3.5, ISO 64, exposure 1/500 sec taken with 72 Hoya, f/3.5, ISO64, exposure 5 sec, custom WB taken with 72 Hoya, f/3.5, ISO64, exposure 3 sec, custom WB taken with 72 Hoya, f/3.5, ISO64, exposure 4 sec, tungsten WB |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8
|
Have 717 and use Hoya IR72 and CPL.
So far so good, quite satisfied but thinking to buy another ND filter. Always take the picture in Nightshot mode as no need tripod. Useful links for IR 717, 1. Tutorial - http://www.pbase.com/jerrykneupper/ir_tutorial&page=all 2. Color correction - http://www.pbase.com/catson/color_infrared_workflow BTW, seems F828 is slightly better as it can take on ISO50 (cmiiw). |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
H1 does not have a night shot mode like F717... only have the normal night portrait modes. It is not the same as the Night Shot where you can shoot in absolute darkness...
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
BTW what is CPL huh? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eastern Singapore
Posts: 797
|
I own a Sony F717 and only shoot IR with it. My regular "colour" photo shoots are with DSLR.
Therefore I can assure you that F717 CAN shoot IR handheld (no modification) IF you use the "night shot" mode, cover the the two emitters, use hoya 72 and ND filters. Lastly you must also know how to "photoshop" it to get the final image. Cheers Last edited by tim; 30th January 2007 at 09:13 PM. Reason: wrong wording |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,582
|
H1 settings: White Balance = tungsten. Please note that you can use manual WB using a white piece of paper. Makes PP in PS a bit easier afterwards. ![]() ISO = 100 (200 works even better) Exposure time = 4 sec (could be 2 sec with a higher ISO) F-stop: f/5 On a relatively bright day, with those settings, you can already see outlines of the objects in the viewfinder. I focused on an area of high contrast, in this case the building on the right. This allowed the H1 to focus lock without any problems, then I just re-composed the shot to get more of the trees in. The output picture is VERY magenta/pink. This is ok and normal. Load the pic in PS. I then did the following: 1. Image -> Adjustments -> Auto Color That's it. If the auto color uses a wrong object as it's white base, you can go to Image -> Adjustments -> Color balance and reduce the magenta before trying the auto color again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
Will try again... see how... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 45
|
http://www.pbase.com/eclipse1968/infrared. No need modification unless you want to use infrared manually i.e. aperture / speed settings. But i see people doing this overseas. If not, you can use Hoya72 and ND8. Cheers!!! Actually, im pondering selling my F717 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
Just started to shoot some pics with a F717... Did 2 ways of PP using PS...
Comments please... http://psccy.multiply.com/photos/photo/17/8>Lamp Post.jpg Processed using the method explained in this forum... http://psccy.multiply.com/photos/photo/17/22>Lamp Post (JL Workflow).jpg Processed using Joseph Levy's method in his Pbase site... BTW, anyone can show me how to insert a pic from multiply.com? I can on input hyperlinks so far... |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,582
|
Multiply requires us to log in. In this case, it requires the CS forum to log on as a user. Try using photobucket? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
Did post porcessing on 2 similar photos, using different techniques... Comments please...
![]() Processed using the method as described in sticky put up by Max 2.8... ![]() Processed using the method as described by Joseph Levy in his Pbase website... Which do you prefer? or none at all? Last edited by psccy; 15th February 2007 at 10:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
|
Hi, if you are using the nightshot feature of F717, then the channel swap method may not be the best. Joseph's method might be better
Last edited by Velectron; 15th February 2007 at 12:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holland Close
Posts: 629
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
|
also use only iso 100 Last edited by Velectron; 15th February 2007 at 12:25 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|