View Poll Results: Do you use 3rd party lenses?

Voters
1083. You may not vote on this poll
  • No, 3rd party lenses are crap. I use only original lenses.

    87 8.03%
  • Yes, I use only 3rd party lenses. They are as good as the original camera makers' lenses

    51 4.71%
  • I only use 3rd party lenses. They are better than original lenses.

    11 1.02%
  • I only use 3rd party lenses. They may not be as good as original lenses but they are cheaper and good enough.

    103 9.51%
  • No, 3rd party lenses are NOT necessarily crap but I use and buy only original lenses whenever possible.

    245 22.62%
  • I use a mixture of both

    569 52.54%
  • I don't use lenses. I spent too much on my whizz bang bells and whistles camera so I can't afford a similar lens full of bells and whistles so I rather not use a cheap lens, 3rd party or original.

    17 1.57%
Page 1 of 11 1236 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 206

Thread: Do you use 3rd party lenses?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default Do you use 3rd party lenses?

    As subject.

  2. #2
    ClubSNAP Admin Edmund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    No, 3rd party lenses are NOT necessarily crap but I use and buy only original lenses whenever possible.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by Edmund
    No, 3rd party lenses are NOT necessarily crap but I use and buy only original lenses whenever possible.
    Incorporated your answer into the poll.

    Regards
    CK

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    How about:

    I only use 3rd party lenses. They may not be as good as original lenses but they are cheaper and good enough.

    I only use 3rd party lenses. They are better than original lenses.

    I don't use lenses. I spent too much on my whizz bang bells and whistles camera so I can't afford a similar lens full of bells and whistles so I rather not use a cheap lens, 3rd party or original.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by Jed
    How about:

    I only use 3rd party lenses. They may not be as good as original lenses but they are cheaper and good enough.

    I only use 3rd party lenses. They are better than original lenses.

    I don't use lenses. I spent too much on my whizz bang bells and whistles camera so I can't afford a similar lens full of bells and whistles so I rather not use a cheap lens, 3rd party or original.
    added. hey, how come you are not on icq?

    Regards
    CK

  6. #6
    ClubSNAP Idol Adam Goi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    5,682

    Default

    I'm a sucker for originals

  7. #7
    ClubSNAP Admin
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    ClubSNAP
    Posts
    667,073

    Default

    Originally posted by AdamGoi
    I'm a sucker for originals
    AdamGoi = ORIGINAL SUCKERS ???

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Oi, I was joking lah... at least for one or two of them! Now the poll is very wordy leh...

    And BTW, anyone have trouble loading the smilie today? Along with three others in the top two rows...

  9. #9

    Default

    Originally posted by AdamGoi
    I'm a sucker for originals
    SO you must be one of those that say 3rd party len are crap...

  10. #10

    Default

    Originally posted by Bluestrike

    SO you must be one of those that say 3rd party len are crap...

    of coz it is not true, some 3rd party lens are much better than orginal.

  11. #11

    Default

    Originally posted by ninelives



    of coz it is not true, some 3rd party lens are much better than orginal.
    I know! hehehe

    I'm a 3rd party guy ......

    hehheee...Sigma .....

  12. #12

    Default

    I use mostly third party lenses, and only originals when they're cheap and good.

  13. #13
    ClubSNAP Idol Adam Goi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    5,682

    Default

    Originally posted by Bluestrike

    SO you must be one of those that say 3rd party len are crap...
    Hey! Dun any how say hor; just say that I'm just someone who siao original...used to hear from a friend who knew a guy who siao Giordano and guess wat...from head to toe; inside to outside...all Giordano!

  14. #14

    Default

    Originally posted by AdamGoi


    Hey! Dun any how say hor; just say that I'm just someone who siao original...used to hear from a friend who knew a guy who siao Giordano and guess wat...from head to toe; inside to outside...all Giordano!
    Hahaha... relax lah just joking only lah!

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    223

    Default

    Can save alot using 3rd party lenses. Do not own any 3rd party lens yet. Btw, heard that Sigma is popular. They also manufacture their own camera rite? Izzit available here? Any other well known 3rd party manufacturers?

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by makan007
    Can save alot using 3rd party lenses. Do not own any 3rd party lens yet. Btw, heard that Sigma is popular. They also manufacture their own camera rite? Izzit available here? Any other well known 3rd party manufacturers?
    Sigma's 2 SLRs are the SA7 and SA9. I believe FotoGuide should have them.

    The other popular makers are : Tokina, Tamron, and Cosina. The not-so-popular ones include Vivitar, Koboron.

    Regards
    CK

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,464

    Default

    Hi

    i hate to say this, cos it will make me sound like i'm some kind of anti-film freak (which i am not ), but if u're a film user, and u know u only print 4 x 6 most of the time, then it doesn't matter whether u use original or third party lenses, top of the line "L" or "AFS" lens or third party consumer grade models - most of the time u wouldn't be able to see the difference!

    The top of the line lenses have high resolving power which is only apparent when u start to make bigger prints, beyond 8 x 10. otherwise, that top of the line "L" lens and the top of the line third party lens will produce pics with very little visible difference with small prints.

    Besides, how many film users actually use GOOD loupes to examine their images? Unless u have "L" class loupes ;P, everything will appear good enough to u.

    Conversely, in digital, u're constantly staring at the pictures in Photoshop 100% (and that's far more than any loupe can go), and at that size (maybe equivalent to a 20 x 30 print?), u see EVERYTHING - all the defects, softness, optical flaws, chromatic abberations etc etc.......magnify that to 200% and u can really see which lens can resolve more.......

    so naturally u will want to gravitate to a better lens. Also, it's much easier to print 8 x 10s at home for digital prints, and i believe pple tend to do more of that compared to film.............

    agree?
    David Teo
    View my work and blog at http://www.5stonesphoto.com/blog

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Yes, except for viewing being at 20"x30". Not really.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by Red Dawn
    Hi

    i hate to say this, cos it will make me sound like i'm some kind of anti-film freak (which i am not ), but if u're a film user, and u know u only print 4 x 6 most of the time, then it doesn't matter whether u use original or third party lenses, top of the line "L" or "AFS" lens or third party consumer grade models - most of the time u wouldn't be able to see the difference!

    The top of the line lenses have high resolving power which is only apparent when u start to make bigger prints, beyond 8 x 10. otherwise, that top of the line "L" lens and the top of the line third party lens will produce pics with very little visible difference with small prints.

    Besides, how many film users actually use GOOD loupes to examine their images? Unless u have "L" class loupes ;P, everything will appear good enough to u.

    Conversely, in digital, u're constantly staring at the pictures in Photoshop 100% (and that's far more than any loupe can go), and at that size (maybe equivalent to a 20 x 30 print?), u see EVERYTHING - all the defects, softness, optical flaws, chromatic abberations etc etc.......magnify that to 200% and u can really see which lens can resolve more.......

    so naturally u will want to gravitate to a better lens. Also, it's much easier to print 8 x 10s at home for digital prints, and i believe pple tend to do more of that compared to film.............

    agree?
    If I am not wrong, there ARE "L" loupes by Canon. Or so I read.

    Actually, there are noticeable differences between 4R prints made of a neg shot with a 3rd party lens and one shot with quality glass. I experienced that myself during my sis's wedding - I had handed over my FE with Tamron 35-70 f3.5 to the official photog, who had a F5 + AFS 28-70 f2.8D ED-IF, for my family portriat. So he shot one on the F5, one on the FE. When the prints came back, the difference is amazing 28-70 AFS one is so much sharper (at that price, it better be).

    Yup, you are right. At 100% on screen, a 3mp file is roughly 20x30". More than any loupe can magnify. You see everything, all the flaws of the lens, all the sharpness (or lack thereof). And the lack of grain does not help to hide any artifacts. Maybe that's why good quality glass is more critical in the high end digital SLRs.

    Regards
    CK

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Actually, what I meant is that it's not the same as viewing a 20x30 print...

Page 1 of 11 1236 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •