Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne/Singapore
    Posts
    1,250

    Default Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    Hypothetical question:

    A photographer buys pictures from stock agencies and resells them to his clients as part of poster designs. Is that ethical or even legal in the 1st place?

    Note hypothetical, so pls dun jumpt to conclusions or ask me who it is

  2. #2

    Default Re: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    Is the pic RM?
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Clementi, Singapore
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    If its RF, then designers (or the photographer who downloaded) can use it in work and sell it to their clients.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Sion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    新天地
    Posts
    4,768

    Default Re: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    Quote Originally Posted by wildstallion View Post
    If its RF, then designers (or the photographer who downloaded) can use it in work and sell it to their clients.
    I would qualify it that only in the extended licences offered by the RF microsites.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Clementi, Singapore
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    Quote Originally Posted by Sion View Post
    I would qualify it that only in the extended licences offered by the RF microsites.
    I believe EL's would only apply to specific circumstances, like mass reproduction. Under normal licensing I believe its allowed, otherwise whats the point? Of course they must be allowed to use the image to sell to clients, in whatever form that may be (advert etc)

  6. #6
    vince123123
    Guests

    Default Re: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    Royalty Free does not necessarily mean you can do anything you like with it. The two are separate and different concepts - one of payment, and the other of transfer/licensing of rights

    Quote Originally Posted by wildstallion View Post
    If its RF, then designers (or the photographer who downloaded) can use it in work and sell it to their clients.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Hypothetical question regarding stock photos

    Poster design is a common use for stock photography, both RM and RF. However, the designer would have to check the T&C of the particular site for the particulars on licensing and allowable usage. Some RF agencies allow use in newspaper ads without having to buy an Extended License whilst others don't. With posters, it would probably depend on how many were to be printed and where they would be used i.e. would the poster also be used as a print ad in a magazine or newspaper. Would the image also be used in a web design? etc...

    Do PM me for more info on stock photography if need be.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •