Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: WPJs... would you bring...?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default WPJs... would you bring...?

    Along a fast telephoto zoom mounted? like say 80-200/2.8 for AD coverage?

    I could probably visualise some usage for such a lens like capturing the more candid moments. But the weight factor might outweigh the returns... especially when I already carry a 17-55/2.8 and a 85/1.4.

    Just looking for some input from the more experienced friends here on whether you have missed capturing poignant moments because of lens lack-of-reach.

  2. #2

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    More heavy equipment means you not reach as fast as you normally woulud in an event shoot. Also, it wears out your energy faster. One way is to work out more in the gym to build more mass and strength and to build more endurance if you prefer more lenses.

  3. #3
    Account Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    I love my cup & coaster!
    Posts
    754

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    I bring the below. (refer to sig).

  4. #4

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    i seriously prefer to travel light. especially if u shoot often u'd get what i mean..
    hahaha

    cheers

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by wazzup View Post
    I bring the below. (refer to sig).
    and wear them webbing style?

  6. #6
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    and wear them webbing style?
    I believe he uses a large shoulder bag...

  7. #7

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    Along a fast telephoto zoom mounted? like say 80-200/2.8 for AD coverage?

    I could probably visualise some usage for such a lens like capturing the more candid moments. But the weight factor might outweigh the returns... especially when I already carry a 17-55/2.8 and a 85/1.4.

    Just looking for some input from the more experienced friends here on whether you have missed capturing poignant moments because of lens lack-of-reach.
    To me, it depends on the location. If the events happen in small areas like HDB, then the telephoto zoom will be redundant.

    In my view, to be an effective journalistic photographer, you need to equip with more than one camera body to avoid changing lenses and to cater for redundancy. There is no second chance for capturing the moments. And you certainly shouldn't scrimp on equipment for convenience sake.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    2,156

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    the photog can bring provided:

    1) he is a seasoned photog, can handle two cameras + 2 lens. no need un / mount .
    2) he is strong as he will not be travelling light


  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    That would make me want to carry one more body in addition to the 2 I bring normally

    pianodancer: yep you are right on the setting of the wedding. And in the typical chinese wedding, the morning events would seldom require a telephoto. (unless they stay in a HUGE house heh)

    Tks for all the feedback, just wanted to see if anyone else felt the same need to equip with a telephoto during the wedding dinners. Because I certainly felt the lack of reach when I covered as a 2nd photog at a recent one... feet couldn't zoom fast enough for me to reach with my 85/1.4... and it felt abit "obstrusive" to stick a cam infront of a tearing relative.

    Weight actually isn't a real concern for me. Just the lens changing bit. Guess more practice makes perfect. My first assignment as main photog this coming weekend. Having a little bit of jitters that's all
    Last edited by Yatlapball; 22nd January 2007 at 01:11 PM.

  10. #10

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    Along a fast telephoto zoom mounted? like say 80-200/2.8 for AD coverage?

    I could probably visualise some usage for such a lens like capturing the more candid moments. But the weight factor might outweigh the returns... especially when I already carry a 17-55/2.8 and a 85/1.4.

    Just looking for some input from the more experienced friends here on whether you have missed capturing poignant moments because of lens lack-of-reach.
    i seriously think a 17-55 is good enuff , unless u are doing a church wedding and the priest dun let u go near the altar.

    Dun worry too much about missing some action over at the other far end. Thing is, by the time u wipe out ur long lens and want to shoot what is happening over there, the moment is lost.
    The idea is to know where the action is going to happen and be there to capture it. In tis case, a 17-55 is more than good enuff.

    I've been wanting to try to shoot an entire wedding with just a 30mm lens ( about 50mm on a 1.6 body) but, so far, dun dare yet.

    Any pros can let me tag along to try?

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    2,156

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by cosycatus View Post

    The idea is to know where the action is going to happen and be there to capture it. In tis case, a 17-55 is more than good enuff.

    You are right! Anticipate where and when the fun actions will be

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mostly SF, Sometimes SGP
    Posts
    424

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    personally, i really like the 100mm+ range for the compression factor.

  13. #13

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    17-55 captures the mood of the event, 80-200 captures the expressions of the individual.

  14. #14

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Your camera with the 17-50 lens carry on your neck.
    Your the other camera with the telephoto lens put on your tripod.
    This is the best way!
    Flickr Me! :: Nikon D80 :: Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4.5 DC MACRO

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    ckuang & pianodancer: tks! I think I might try having the 80-200 on the 2nd body, keeping the 85 only for the deliberate posed shots.

    raymond: tripod? a little too unwieldy in a AD shoot right?

  16. #16

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    if possible, 2 cam bodies, 2 lens, 2 flashes, n many many extra batteries, memory cards

  17. #17

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    Along a fast telephoto zoom mounted? like say 80-200/2.8 for AD coverage?

    I could probably visualise some usage for such a lens like capturing the more candid moments. But the weight factor might outweigh the returns... especially when I already carry a 17-55/2.8 and a 85/1.4.

    Just looking for some input from the more experienced friends here on whether you have missed capturing poignant moments because of lens lack-of-reach.

    Depending on situation, i might bring along either the 80-200 f2.8 / sigma 70-200 f2.8 or 180mm f2.8

    But for most part i jus mount the 17-35 f2.8 on one body and 28-70 f2.8 on another. I usually carry a FE along. Used much more often than the telelens.

  18. #18
    Account Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    I love my cup & coaster!
    Posts
    754

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    and wear them webbing style?
    Nope

    Quote Originally Posted by zac08 View Post
    I believe he uses a large shoulder bag...
    Bingo

  19. #19
    Senior Member jOhO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    6,485

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    Along a fast telephoto zoom mounted? like say 80-200/2.8 for AD coverage?

    I could probably visualise some usage for such a lens like capturing the more candid moments. But the weight factor might outweigh the returns... especially when I already carry a 17-55/2.8 and a 85/1.4.

    Just looking for some input from the more experienced friends here on whether you have missed capturing poignant moments because of lens lack-of-reach.
    nope.. my 70-200 was in cold storage for 6 months before i decided to sell it off to someone who would use it more. and i kinda... shoot a wedding almost every week... i suppose 6 months is a good guage to know that i would not use that lens forever!

    as u mentioned, i use the 85/1.4 in place of that heavy lump of good glass.

  20. #20

    Default Re: WPJs... would you bring...?

    If I dun have another tele zoom/prime, it's 1 of those lens that i will hoard, just to "cover all focal lengths". U never know when u gonna need it.

    .

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •