![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Woody Land
Posts: 1,610
|
Im thinkg of getting a prime lens.
I cant make up my mind which one i should get. Intending to use this lens mainly for portraitures in studio and outdoors. Can anyone give their opinion? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,190
|
tell me
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: http://www.sgPixelArt.com
Posts: 1,441
|
Hmmm... depends if you want to shoot whole body, half body more... if whole body... in a studio of limited space.... the 85mm would be better...
The 105 and 135 has DC so if you find that feature useful, this is also a consideration. Hope this helps. ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sewage drain/manhole
Posts: 4,959
|
YMMV.
__________________
Studio TFCD :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Farmhouse, Somewhere
Posts: 433
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 65
|
i have the 85 1.4D, i simply love it, not yet own at 105 or 135, but at 1.5x crop. it might be too long if shoot at tight space indoors. will buy all if i can afford
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sewage drain/manhole
Posts: 4,959
|
__________________
Studio TFCD :-) |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,450
|
105dc. my second choice will be 85 1.4 but because the 105dc can control front of rear defocus, that's why it's versatile.especially for portraits. loads has been said about these 2 lenses. do a search on google. or even dpreview. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 758
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Up North......
Posts: 652
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central West
Posts: 1,913
|
razor,
The 105 f/2 is the classic portraiture lens and would do very well for most situations. If you want a slightly shorter focal length (due to space constraints etc), I'd actually consider the 85 f/1.8 over the 85 f/1.4. The 85 f/1.8 has the same/similar optical formulae as the 105 f/2 and 135 f/2. The 85 f/1.4 has more elements and can tend to flare/ghost more than the f/1.8. The 1.4 does have the advantage of giving you more light in a low light environment, but if most of your work is in a studio... even outdoors, you'd not be shooting at 1.4 a lot of the time. And at a little over the third the price, it is well worth considering. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 758
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,189
|
85mm 1.4...cos on crop body its long enuff already...
maybe can even consider 50mm or 60mm range |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Woody Land
Posts: 1,610
|
HEy all!
Thanks so much for your insights! Guess each lens has its own strength. Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
DX or film? Think of the working distance first. For all you know, 50/1.4 might be more ideal for DX.
Last edited by lsisaxon; 13th December 2006 at 11:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Woody Land
Posts: 1,610
|
im shooting on digital. i do have a 50mm f/1.4.... somehow... there is a slight bloat when shooting people..
Last edited by razor; 14th December 2006 at 09:54 AM. |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|