Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

  1. #41
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Quote Originally Posted by dawgbyte77 View Post
    ...........................

    And wedding nowadays is not so once-in-a-lifetime anymore. There were 1 divorse for every 4 weddings last year in Singapore. Perhaps there is a new group of market.
    repeat customers have discount izit?
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  2. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,164

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
    repeat customers have discount izit?
    Its network marketing. You now have 2 leads. Anyway... soon there could be divorse photography with free SDU photos.

  3. #43

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Why would I want to fault my clients who scrimp? They went through 99 presentation which emphasised on prices. When they sat down with me, and I try to convince them on the importance of choosing the "right photographer", why is it their fault that they had already been conditioned by the other 99 to place more emphasis on price?

    I don't fault the photographer B as well. He has his business values, I have mine. At the end of a presentation, they are couples who eventually decide I'm not the photographer for them. Instead of undercutting, I would find out what's the type of photographer they want, and in fact, make recommendations of other photographers to them. They are some who prefer photogs who are more experienced, and I will share on how the experienced photogs I've work with have very good understanding on customs and stuff. There are some who prefer portraits, and I'll try to find someone who can shoot portraits because I suck at posing. Because I know, if I go the undercutting route, I'm killing the industry the feeds me. Not immediately, but slowly, in the bigger scheme of things. Most importantly, the couple gets to find the right photographer. I want to help them find the right photographer. Not necessarily an expensive one, not necessarily a cheap one. But the right one.

    And sorry, I totally can't get your analogy on TVs. They are way beyond me. I can manage to get one word out of the paragraph, 'afford'. I'm not addressing your analogy coz I can't understand it, but I personally think "afford" is an over-rated word. My latest booking came from a couple who couldn't 'afford' me, but wanted to meet up to chat anyway. They ended up spending another couple of hundreds worth of products than my base price. On their own. Are they rich? No. They managed to see and sort out their priorities. There is absolutely nothing wrong with any couple who places less priority on photography. But I am pretty disagreeable with pseudo-photogs who undermine the art they are selling by treating them as mere commodities. That in itself is sad, because I really, really feel, Singapore photogs, wedding photogs, are exhibiting immense potential to grow artisitically given the space and opportunities, after seeing so many budding talents bloom these few years. Price wars and viscious volumes are not going to give space for Singapore to become one of the powerhouses in the world, or in the region for that matter, where the art of wedding photography is concerned.


    Quote Originally Posted by dawgbyte77 View Post
    In this example, its your potential ex-client's fault to scrimp and choose the cheaper photographer and not the photographer's fault who undercut you. I still agree with the logic that inexperience photographers have to start somewhere and this is the only avenue to do so. And for those who have improved and believe they are now good enough to charge higher who are having a hard time, I think its a mistake to continue sourcing at the market pool catered to c-d class, he have to move to the a-b class, and if he can't do so then perhaps he is not yet ready.

    I think the point with the analogy with the TV of Sony vs Akira did not hit the mark. It should be the same factor where class c-d will choose Akira because thats the only thing they can afford. While class a-b may choose Sony if quality is a big concern and they can easily afford it. And when Akira finally decides that he can and he want to compete with Sony, he will focus on class b-c, and perhaps later a-b, much like what Samsung is trying to do now.

    And wedding nowadays is not so once-in-a-lifetime anymore. There were 1 divorse for every 4 weddings last year in Singapore. Perhaps there is a new group of market.
    Last edited by shinken; 30th November 2006 at 05:26 PM.

  4. #44
    Senior Member Virgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West of Singapore
    Posts
    4,816

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    My view is very simple: time will tell. One of these days, they (or just he/she?) will know that their time is so cheap!

    I wish them all the best.
    Kind Regards
    My Picture Website

  5. #45

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Actually, i dun find the photos too bad for the price they are offering.
    So what is wrong? To be frank, i've seen photographers who charge more, and offer less.

    Low price doesn't mean they are any less professional, it doesn't mean they are going to come and tell u that " oh, my camera spoiled, so cannot shoot".

    Low price is due to a lower quality of work. Some couples dun really insist on the need to have fantastic pictures , or they are satisfied with the quality offered. So why go out and blast people who offered budget services?
    MUST EVERYONE PAY 1.5K just to have a record of his weddding? OR EVEN 6K for that matter?

    I think we have too many self-righteous photographers who think they are trying to defend their craft.
    I think these photographers are just afraid they will lose their livlihood.
    I think, IF YOU ARE GOOD, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO BE AFRAID OF.

  6. #46

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    what i would really like to hear from is for someone who recently got married
    and run through with us ,,,,,,,,,what were the things they considered
    and what went through their minds after viewing several photog's work

    Anyone here recently got married ???

  7. #47

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Quote Originally Posted by cosycatus View Post
    Actually, i dun find the photos too bad for the price they are offering.
    .
    Are you married? My personal advice to those who still dun hav experience... If your wife-to-be says this to you... .... better dun believe.

    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  8. #48
    Senior Member roDz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Rafa & Kuyt's neighbourhood
    Posts
    647

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Guys..don't get easily conned by couples who said they're on budget but still need a photographer to cover their wedding coz i've one experience when a couple(someone i know) asked me to cover their wedding. Guess what?? They asked me to get a videographer also after i quoted a rate(lower than what i usually quote) No offence to videographer as i was one before but nowadays,i quote what i have to quote..

  9. #49

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYRN View Post
    Are you married? My personal advice to those who still dun hav experience... If your wife-to-be says this to you... .... better dun believe.

    haha, care to detail that explaination? Coz, from a cursory glance, frankly i think that they are rather acceptable.

  10. #50

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    Quote Originally Posted by radura View Post
    haha, care to detail that explaination? Coz, from a cursory glance, frankly i think that they are rather acceptable.
    I meant that if she says she dun mind, at the end of the day, if the photos are not what she expects, you'll "suffer"...hahaha

    If you dun believe...go browse Sgbrides.
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  11. #51
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    6,601

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    I'd agree with the ideology of NOT going with price, though it is a MAJOR FACTOR for deciding.

    Although I have a floating working cost, I know I can aim at a niche higher than most others do. And yes, you don't pay me more for my backup equipment - cos that had been already factored in...

    Food for thought - "OK WHAT! My skill very good ok! $500 for whole day, got this got that, got dvd notebook presentation etc etc.... you mean, still not worth it? eh, they're my COST price ok...."

    That's regarding the $500-per-day photographer. He's probably selling frills than photos. He should become a sales guy for floundering HDB stores instead.
    Last edited by sehsuan; 7th December 2006 at 08:52 AM.

  12. #52

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    With Budget Airlines come Budget Photography....

  13. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Dover Vista
    Posts
    161

    Default Re: Calling all full-time photographer- Care to comment abt this?

    after going through several discussions about this issue, I dont think I have seen anyone put himself on a new-serious-photographer's shoes.

    A photographer can only charge high if he is well-known. Yes, if he has already shot a lot of famous ppl's wedding or when a couple's looking for a photographer for their wedding, everyone knows about him and refers him. In this case, yes, if the couple really want high quality product, the photographer can charge higher.

    But how about a not-so-famous photographer, or even a just-step-out photographer, who has been assissting another photographer for a period of time and has gained quite an experience? I believe these photographer are good also and they want to do well so that they can charge as high as the famous ones. But how can they charge that high when they just step out? Of course, they have to lower the price so that they can attract customers to at least build up their own portfolio. Clients have their own perception: well-known = high price; not well-know = lower price. Quality sometimes cannot beat this perception.

    I particular have a friend, who has just got his first wedding job. It was his first job doing wedding and the client also didnt want to go for super professional quality. So, of course he couldnt charge several k right? However, he could capture the nice moments, keep the nice memories and his shots were nice and the client satisfied.

    Of course I'm against those are not responsible (by this i mean when they get the job, either free, low price or high price, they should work their best). But dont associate low price and low quality too much. There are ppl who can do really well but just couldnt charge high.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •