Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Travel lens?

  1. #1

    Default Travel lens?

    Hi all,

    I m thinking of getting a EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM for my 400D. Shld be able to minimise changing of lens since wider range than my kit 18-55. Gg to cambodian rural areas this dec. Any comments on this lens or any better suggestions?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by phraeb View Post
    Hi all,

    I m thinking of getting a EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM for my 400D. Shld be able to minimise changing of lens since wider range than my kit 18-55. Gg to cambodian rural areas this dec. Any comments on this lens or any better suggestions?

    don't know about your preference but I find 17mm or 18mm is quite essential for capturing those landscape....

  3. #3

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    if dun want to spend too much...get 28-125 + use your kit lenses for wide angle.....although not very wide also.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by foreverlovex View Post
    if dun want to spend too much...get 28-125 + use your kit lenses for wide angle.....although not very wide also.
    typo....135.......haha

  5. #5

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by foreverlovex View Post
    if dun want to spend too much...get 28-125 + use your kit lenses for wide angle.....although not very wide also.
    yea, will prob bring my kit along loh. 28mm suitable for landscape??

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    2,504

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    the 28-135 isn't exactly the sharpest lens around. i suggest the sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6. it is sharp, light and costs about $200 less than the 28-135 (2nd hand)

    there's one for sale here: http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=238669

    for the price u pay for a 28-135 ($500+ 2nd hand), i'd rather get a 17-70mm sigma or a 17-50mm f/2.8 tamron.
    Last edited by Isaiahfortythirtyone; 26th November 2006 at 09:55 PM.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by Isaiahfortythirtyone View Post
    the 28-135 isn't exactly the sharpest lens around. i suggest the sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6. it is sharp, light and costs about $200 less than the 28-135 (2nd hand)

    there's one for sale here: http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=238669

    for the price u pay for a 28-135 ($500+ 2nd hand), i'd rather get a 17-70mm sigma or a 17-50mm f/2.8 tamron.
    the higher price of the canon one, i think shld be becos of the IS bah. not too sure abt the sigma one, new to lens. haha.... hmmm....sounds like a reasonable offer.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    2,504

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by phraeb View Post
    the higher price of the canon one, i think shld be becos of the IS bah. not too sure abt the sigma one, new to lens. haha.... hmmm....sounds like a reasonable offer.
    i've survived without IS till now it's nice to have, but not absolutely essential unless you're using telephoto lenses (some may beg to differ of course).

    with the sigmas and tamrons, you get the benefit of wide angle. the sigma 18-125 gives you approx 29mm wide angle on a 1.6x camera. the tamron 17-50 gives you about 28mm thereabouts. the canon 28-135 gives you 44mm. if i wanted an all in one travel lens, i would like wide angle for sure.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    SengKang, Singapore
    Posts
    212

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by phraeb View Post
    Hi all,

    I m thinking of getting a EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM for my 400D.
    How much you are paying for the lens?

  10. #10

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by eagletay View Post
    How much you are paying for the lens?
    $672 as listed from the price list page. i find it quite steep for a newbie like me and i still got a few other stuffs to buy for my trip. dunno how worth isit

  11. #11

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by Isaiahfortythirtyone View Post
    i've survived without IS till now it's nice to have, but not absolutely essential unless you're using telephoto lenses (some may beg to differ of course).

    with the sigmas and tamrons, you get the benefit of wide angle. the sigma 18-125 gives you approx 29mm wide angle on a 1.6x camera. the tamron 17-50 gives you about 28mm thereabouts. the canon 28-135 gives you 44mm. if i wanted an all in one travel lens, i would like wide angle for sure.
    yea, IS i guess its a luxury bah. wide angle is definitely something gd to have in a travel lens. hmmmm, i really have little knowledge abt lens and especially 3rd party lens....

  12. #12

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Get the Sigma 18-200mm and you can leave the kit lens at home.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    i strongly recommend a wide-angle lens for travelling, esp. to rural areas where there are lots of horizons to be captured. at least 17mm, esp. for your 1.6x crop cam.
    Canon 5D & 35L + Panasonic Lumix GX1 & 20mm
    Flickr | Buy Baobao's photobook!

  14. #14

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Same comments as other, it would be good to have a wider ange lens. During my trip to Cambodia, I brought my 17-40L and 85mm USM. 80% of the time was using 17-40L.

    Feel free to visit my Siem Reap photos gallery
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  15. #15

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by fireframe View Post
    Get the Sigma 18-200mm and you can leave the kit lens at home.
    18-200 is a real gd range and sigma prices are much more affordable for newbie who has a tight budget like me. any critiques abt this lens? positive or negative? is it light and portable?

  16. #16

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by megaweb View Post
    Same comments as other, it would be good to have a wider ange lens. During my trip to Cambodia, I brought my 17-40L and 85mm USM. 80% of the time was using 17-40L.

    Feel free to visit my Siem Reap photos gallery
    hi, very nice, sharp and expressive photos you got there. so how often do u have to zoom, really? actually, i m not a tourist to cambodia, more of a community worker on volunteer basis. so most of the time i will be based in villages doing community work. so i would estimate, 60% portrait, head and shoulder shots and the landscape shots should come during my R n R.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    using the 28-135is with my 300d (yep old but no need to change if it aint broken) for my travels and find it good enough for my standards, most of the time the limit is me and not the lens or the camera. I find the IS useful especially when travelling and to reduce a bit of shake especially when the light not to good and no need to use tripod or monopod (i know the IS does not replace the tripod or monopod but it helps for a learner like me). I also like the build of the lens so i would be one who would recommend it.

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    588

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    i think that u should get a low aperture lens. it helps a lot in lower light. i can shoot the whole of the orchard lights using f2.8 and without a tripod.
    5D | 24-70L | 28mm f/1.8 | 580EX

  19. #19

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by phraeb View Post
    hi, very nice, sharp and expressive photos you got there. so how often do u have to zoom, really? actually, i m not a tourist to cambodia, more of a community worker on volunteer basis. so most of the time i will be based in villages doing community work. so i would estimate, 60% portrait, head and shoulder shots and the landscape shots should come during my R n R.
    Since it is not a tour trip, I believe you have plenty of time to take candid and portrait shots of the community workers. I would recommend a prime lens like 50mm, 85mm, 100mm or 135mm for low lighting portrait shots and together with ur 28-135mm for general shots.
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  20. #20

    Default Re: Travel lens?

    Quote Originally Posted by husaini View Post
    using the 28-135is with my 300d (yep old but no need to change if it aint broken) for my travels and find it good enough for my standards, most of the time the limit is me and not the lens or the camera. I find the IS useful especially when travelling and to reduce a bit of shake especially when the light not to good and no need to use tripod or monopod (i know the IS does not replace the tripod or monopod but it helps for a learner like me). I also like the build of the lens so i would be one who would recommend it.
    ah, something abt 28-135IS, erm do you have any photos for me to see? haha

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •