![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 618
|
hi, wondering which lens would you buy?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Eastern end of SG
Posts: 574
|
it really depends on what you will be shooting.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere near a chinese lake
Posts: 1,109
|
These 2 lenses have different focal length, it depends on whether you want to have a wider angle view and what type of body you are using it with. The Sigma is only suitable for APS-C size sensor while you can use the Tamron for full frame camera. But the Sigma allows you to go wider on APS-C size camera.
I bought the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, for the constant 2.8 aperture and the ability to use with my film body. I have another ultra wide zoom to cover the wide angle view. You may prefer to have Sigma for the larger range of focal length. Both lenses are quite good for their price.
__________________
My Flickr Gallery |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 618
|
i am using Canon 350D. i have heard very good reviews about the tamron 28-75mm. For the sigma 17-70mm, besides wider, wat other strengths over the tamron?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 198
|
You may want to take a look at this review about the Sigma over here
http://photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/...2845/index.htm |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,273
|
no brainer to me.. tamron - if u get a good copy, its fantastic IQ.. and F2.8 all the way.
if i need something wide i.e. 17mm-28mm.. i can always use kit lens. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 333
|
tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 good for potrait & sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 for potrait also landscape.
make ur own decision ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amazon Forest
Posts: 1,623
|
To me is a question of,
need a fast lens? or a wide lens? If wide(landscape) I won't need fast lens.
__________________
Cleanse your thoughts, not by the foods you eat. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 1,835
|
depends on wat u r shooting?
at 28-75 if u shoot alot of indoor with little light, then this is the lens. Else 17-70 is good enuff for most needs, plus help with an external flash whenever you need to shoot indoor. For me, I like to shoot landscape, 17-70 will be the one I will be going for.
__________________
Canon EOS 50D • 24-105mm f4 L IS • 70-200mm f/4 L • 50mm f/1.8 [b] • |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 333
|
i think f4 is not as slow lens as u think it is. correct or not?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
its actually f2.8-4.5... 1stop does make a different when you are in a desperate situation like ISO1600 yet unable to get sufficient shutter speed.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 1,835
|
Outdoor in daytime, f4 is more than enuff..
Indoor, you need as fast as you can go.. or rather as wide.
__________________
Canon EOS 50D • 24-105mm f4 L IS • 70-200mm f/4 L • 50mm f/1.8 [b] • |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,273
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|