ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 31st October 2006   #1
chjing
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 618
Default Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

hi, wondering which lens would you buy?
chjing is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #2
antere
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Eastern end of SG
Posts: 574
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

it really depends on what you will be shooting.
antere is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #3
kelccm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere near a chinese lake
Posts: 1,109
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

These 2 lenses have different focal length, it depends on whether you want to have a wider angle view and what type of body you are using it with. The Sigma is only suitable for APS-C size sensor while you can use the Tamron for full frame camera. But the Sigma allows you to go wider on APS-C size camera.

I bought the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, for the constant 2.8 aperture and the ability to use with my film body. I have another ultra wide zoom to cover the wide angle view. You may prefer to have Sigma for the larger range of focal length. Both lenses are quite good for their price.
__________________
My Flickr Gallery
kelccm is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 31st October 2006   #4
chjing
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 618
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

i am using Canon 350D. i have heard very good reviews about the tamron 28-75mm. For the sigma 17-70mm, besides wider, wat other strengths over the tamron?
chjing is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #5
PointBlue
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 198
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

You may want to take a look at this review about the Sigma over here
http://photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/...2845/index.htm
PointBlue is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #6
jdredd
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,273
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

no brainer to me.. tamron - if u get a good copy, its fantastic IQ.. and F2.8 all the way.

if i need something wide i.e. 17mm-28mm.. i can always use kit lens.
jdredd is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #7
ioriroger
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 333
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 good for potrait & sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 for potrait also landscape.
make ur own decision
ioriroger is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #8
dominator
Senior Member
 
dominator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amazon Forest
Posts: 1,623
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

To me is a question of,

need a fast lens? or a wide lens?

If wide(landscape) I won't need fast lens.
__________________
Cleanse your thoughts, not by the foods you eat.
dominator is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #9
bwilly
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 1,835
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

depends on wat u r shooting?
at 28-75 if u shoot alot of indoor with little light, then this is the lens.

Else 17-70 is good enuff for most needs, plus help with an external flash whenever you need to shoot indoor.

For me, I like to shoot landscape, 17-70 will be the one I will be going for.
__________________
Canon EOS 50D 24-105mm f4 L IS 70-200mm f/4 L 50mm f/1.8 [b] •
bwilly is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #10
ioriroger
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 333
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

i think f4 is not as slow lens as u think it is. correct or not?
ioriroger is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #11
ExplorerZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

Originally Posted by ioriroger View Post
i think f4 is not as slow lens as u think it is. correct or not?
its actually f2.8-4.5... 1stop does make a different when you are in a desperate situation like ISO1600 yet unable to get sufficient shutter speed.
__________________
multiply || deviant || APAD 08
ExplorerZ is offline  
Old 31st October 2006   #12
bwilly
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 1,835
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

Originally Posted by ioriroger View Post
i think f4 is not as slow lens as u think it is. correct or not?
Outdoor in daytime, f4 is more than enuff..
Indoor, you need as fast as you can go.. or rather as wide.
__________________
Canon EOS 50D 24-105mm f4 L IS 70-200mm f/4 L 50mm f/1.8 [b] •
bwilly is offline  
Old 1st November 2006   #13
jdredd
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,273
Default Re: tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 vs sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4

Originally Posted by ioriroger View Post
i think f4 is not as slow lens as u think it is. correct or not?
... wider aperture also has effect on bokeh.. and AF speed..
jdredd is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08722 seconds with 7 queries