![]() |
|
|||||||
| Video Cameras Using SD, thinking of HD? Find out about video cameras in here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 91
|
I have got the Canon XM2 (or GL2 in USA) video camera and would like to ask what I can do to create that cinema effect? I have tried out the Framed Mode (which a lot of people recommend to create cinema effect) but it's too jerky when I pan the camera.
Do I need to use filter for the effect? If yes, what filter would you recommend? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 881
|
__________________
Buying a DSLR/SLR doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a DSLR/SLR owner My Site |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 91
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: West
Posts: 224
|
Cinema tone was never ever a sepia tone...film has just got way more dynamic range than video. One of the ways to get close to film is to light as if you were shooting film. Shooting in widescreen mode gets in a little closer but nothing helps like great lighting.
Last edited by ywh; 27th October 2006 at 11:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 201
|
Try overlays with Adobe Premier 2.0 to get the effect, can play around with the brightness, control, RGB and etc, can get your close but not as direct as those film settings.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,021
|
i think he's ferering to the filmic look in which alot of people try to achieve. U need to have a cine gamma function in your camera, record at 25P and maybe use P+S technik. Shoot in tru 16:9 format. Also, lighting plays a huge part in it. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: West
Posts: 224
|
Thats very true Chris. But before we get to P+S Technik and 25P...the most basic requirement is still lighting. I have seen too much stuff shot on 25P with crap lighting...what's the point?
Learning how to shoot 25P is the next step. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,021
|
Yup. lighting is very important in bring out the subject, set mood lighting, directional lighting.....etc hmmmm i'd think maybe if u dun wanna use the P+S, u can also try dvc pro 50, shooting 50m with good lighting, or maybe dvx 102b. with the warm tones. it makes normal video naturally a little filmic already. =)
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 544
|
well there is something call shooting on film and shooting on dv or HD...different feel la...haha
Film is much harder to shoot as all FSV people here would know. Its not for mere mortals to shoot film and do it well..lol. I am not kidding lol |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,021
|
Correct, thats why when i was presented the option of film or video, i opted for video and rented a camera from outside. have more control. Anyway, the title of "DOP" is only used for film shooters, not videographers.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 201
|
Even if recording in 25P and having Cine Gama tone will not give you the effect close to the movie you want... Thus try your best to shoot the closest possible, and using your software to edit the tone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Redhill, Singapore
Posts: 346
|
I cut my teeth in lighting before becoming a TP. I agree that lighting makes the biggest impact in achieving that 'film look'.
In truth, it is rather difficult to do. Contrast ratio in film is 1000:1 while that in video is about 40:1 at most. That causes the biggest hurdle. It means film lighting can be contrasty and yet the shadows still look clean. Try that in video and you get murky shadows. Similarly, strong lighting does not wash out the details in film but in video the highlights tend to saturate fast. No doubt, improvements in electronics have introduced knee functions such as 'Cine Gamma'... but these will never match film in range of linearity. Nonetheless, it is good to pick up some innovative tips and tricks from others trying to achieve it:- http://www.bealecorner.com/trv900/filmlook.html Happy experimenting!
__________________
* Take only pictures, leave only footprints, kill only time... and live a life! * :) Alvin Last edited by alvinsclee; 28th October 2006 at 06:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 385
|
It is not recommended that you pan the camera quickly if you're using any of the frame/progressive modes. The low frame rate causes jerky motion. The fast and easy way for the first step is to deinterlace your footage or use the in camera frame mode. Magic Bullet has a plugin for colour correction for this, though the resultant render times are really long.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 642
|
If not mistaken the MagicBullet film look filter comes free with Adobe Premiere Pro versions
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 385
|
It's pretty good. But i'd rather deinterlace and use custom colour curves myself, because the render times are very long. Essentially it deinterlaces/colour curve/glow/tints and that's it. You could do that with any of the built in tools of the NLE yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Currently, Singapore but hope
Posts: 729
|
Most the solutions above are good. As a rule of thumb is to shoot in progressive frame mode on video. If not then convert at post. When in P mode, the viewfinder will always look jerky but will be ok at playback. Also when the camera is in Progressive mode threat the entire camera like a film cam. This meaning big heavy cams moves slower and movements done smoothly like on cranes and tripods.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
|
well, in a nutshell, to achieve a film look, you need a 8/16/35mm film camera with real film. These days, lots of video camcorders (consumer, prosumer) boasts the ability of 'replicating' that film look to no avail. In my own personal research & experience, I've found that the perceived appearance of film (from DVD or Cinema) can be contributed to these factors :-
- the elusive depth of field - true wide format (16:9) - progressive scan (pref 24p / 25p) - that 'color' or many ppl refers to as cine gamma (also lighting of the scene) Therefore, if you were to use a standard prosumer DV or HD camcorders for your shooting medium, get a true 24p camera (ie: Panasonic AG-DVX100 for SD or my dream camera the Panasonic AG-DVX200 for HD) and of course shoot at 24p. Next get a proper lens converter such as the redrock M2 or P+S and use your current nikon or canon lenses to achieve that shallow dept of field look. Next, get a proper matte box with follow focus and grip (you have a brilliant camera, you need a proper light hood to shield stray light from your shoots, the follow focus is for smooth 'film-like' pull or rack focus type shot). All these with natural light and properly set gamma setting can give you decent quality output (you probably need lighting equipment for difficult situation or for a specific look you are after). |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 227
|
Thanks for all the advises. Quite a lot of these methods are alien to me as I basically just point and shoot for family and school events. Not trying to make a movie. Just thought if there is a simple way to create a movie-look. If I read it properly, it seems more tedious then I thought.
Some more questions, hope you don't mind me asking these basic questions: 1. Is the Canon XM2 framed mode considered as Progressive Mode? 2. Is deinterlacing done only using software and computer? 3. I do notice the jerkiness of the video when I record using framed mode. Heard that the video playback will only be smooth if the TV has progressive scan function. Else, it will still be jerky. Err...please correct me if I got the facts wrong. Thanks in advance again. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|