![]() |
|
|||||||
| Video Cameras Using SD, thinking of HD? Find out about video cameras in here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
As stated above, why all the compact cam with Video mode so inefficient in file size for video?
Thanks.
__________________
My Flickr Account |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore, Redhill
Posts: 1,063
|
Poor compression, processor slow, read-write to media slow.
For mainstream video, MiniDV is still pretty much the way to go. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: singapore
Posts: 396
|
i believe most, if not all compact cams uses motion JPEG instead of MPEG compression. Thats why it has a poor compression ratio.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
Slow processor may be....media shouldn't be a problem as I can use SD card to watch very highbandwidth video on my PDA/Laptop...what do you think?
Or may be they are trying to force us to buy another delicated V-Cam, so that they can make more $?
__________________
My Flickr Account |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: singapore
Posts: 396
|
nope.. MPEG and MJPEG is 2 different things. MJPEG is actually JPEGs stacked together to form a video (so the only compression done is when its converted to JPEG) and as for MPEG its does its coding differently.
If you are interested you can read http://www.fileformat.info/format/mpeg/egff.htm for more information. It explains the concepts of MPEG and MJPEG clearly. Last edited by filofari; 25th October 2006 at 12:17 PM. Reason: added additional information |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
when u watch highbandwidth = READ from SD, but when you are recording its WRITE... so must see if your SD card can support fast write anot, its between 1/2 to 75% of the actual read speed normally.
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,396
|
So anyone converts their MJPEG vids from digicams to DivX format?
Or only me do that... . |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
hmm... mjpeg got sound anot? btw, how big your raw file to make u wanna do DIVX compression...
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore, Redhill
Posts: 1,063
|
Generally this happens:
1. The sensor/mic reads the light/sound and translates to electrical signals. 2. The processor first reads the raw signal and record internally as images/sound/data. 3. The compression processor then compresses the raw data into whatever format (MiniDV, DVD, MPEG, DivX, etc.) 4. Then the compressed data is written onto the media (tape, card, harddisc or optical disc). When you read, the data is retrieved from the media, decompressed by the processor into RAW signal, and sent to the output (monitor, speakers). That is the reverse of the image/sound capture. The problem is the compressor and the writer. If you have very fast compressor and very fast writer, then you can do a DivX on the go at hi-res and write ontot he fastest media. But not everyone wants compression, especially those who needs lots of post-editing. MiniDV and it brothers are acceptable compression by most indie video, but TV broadcast will reject most miniDV unless no-choice. So, to write less compressed data means faster write needed. To write faster with more compression means that the compression compressor must really fast. On chips, fast means power-hungry and over-heating. That's why there is always compromises. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
Ok guys, thanks for the info.
__________________
My Flickr Account |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
I convert them to Xvid. The size goes down by about 70-75%!
__________________
My Flickr Account |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
My Canon S3 IS can take video (VGA) with stereo sound for about 8min with 1Gb SD card! So inefficient...so I need to convert to Xvid loh...
__________________
My Flickr Account |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 881
|
big file size is mainly due to compression...the other factor tat make up bigger file size is data collected eg.exposure,color,lighting,resolution...
__________________
Buying a DSLR/SLR doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a DSLR/SLR owner My Site Last edited by dreamerz; 25th October 2006 at 02:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,396
|
on the Fuji F30, 1GB is about 14 mins, at 640x480. . |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|