![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
hi all,
other than the official wide angle conversion by panasonic which is very expensive, is there any other good value for money wide angle lens suitable for FZ50/ FZ30? is there a friendly, reliable shop to get it? thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
thanks again for your prompt reply; |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,843
|
Try getting em from the usual shops like AP or CP, or maybe in the BnS section. Do note that Wcon07 has abit of problem with Fz30. Read this up for potential problems of using the wcon07 on the Fz30 : http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam...ON07-Prob.html Alternatively, you can spend abit more for raynox wide angle lenses. There is a thread on the mass-order/consumer section on it. Look for morphis or head to this thread : http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=189427 the wcon07 is the most bang for buck teleconverter, in my experience of use with the Fz5... but the raynox looks quite good, so if you have abit more to spend, go for the raynox lenses. also, when you use a wcon07, DO NOT ZOOM IN! That defeats the purpose of the wcon, and that's to widen the field of view. Last edited by metallilan; 1st September 2006 at 12:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
thanks for all the info; will wcon 07 cause prob for the FZ50? also is there a shop for the raynox lens for that dont have to wait for mass order? thanks again |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tanah Merah
Posts: 606
|
I think it's the TCON-17, not TCON-07
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,786
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,843
|
Not so sure if the wcon-07 will cause the same problem to the FZ50, but because those 2 models are similar, the chances are quite high.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
i noticed a drop in image quality when i used the converter; is it normal? what does the camera setting adjust when u set to wide conversion other than cut the internal flash?
thanks |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
|
which wide lens did u buy ? i am using e emolux wide lens n the pic quality still remains e same ... juz tat need to zoom abit to remove the distortion on e edges
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
using original lumix wide converter and the recommedation is that to set the zoom to 35mm else will not function properly;
could it be wider angle so less pixel to cover more details? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
also i thought i will be very impressed by the fz50 BUT kind of disappointed. i was using a fz20;
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
for the matter, i think the fz20 shoots better than my TZ1 too;
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
|
i am also nt sure wat's ur problem ... maybe u set ur ISO to 80 n disable the noise reduction fuction has enabling it will cause lost of details....
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
|
fz50 has no iso 80; my fz20 has; so overall i am more impressed when i got my fz20 than when i got my fz50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 564
|
raynox have some pretty afforable..
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|