Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 70

Thread: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

  1. #1

    Default Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Read a recent in-depth comparison of 8MP Konica-Minolta Dimage A2 with 5MP Panasonic DMC-TZ1 dated 3 Jun 06 at

    http://vermeulen.ca/minolta-panasonic.html

    Perhaps, some compact digitals can actually be better than the bigger and more expensive DSLRs if not of their extra features. Any comments?

  2. #2
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    ye, it would depend o the shoot and the subject

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    senGkanG
    Posts
    480

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Hmm.. Dont know how to answer this question..

    But whether the pics is nice anot depends on the user most of the time, rather than the equipment..

  4. #4
    Senior Member yilishengxian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pandan 花园
    Posts
    3,925

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    It depends on the condition and the user
    Every Photo Speaks for its Photographer. 开心就好。
    I wanna be the no.1 GWC !!!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,350

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Artistically, yes, it's definitely possible. Technically, no, or at least most of the time.

    Most DSLRs will be able to give better resolution and render details better. And in most circumstances DSLRs will outperform compacts in terms of degree of noise at high ISO levels. Along with that, you also get improved responsiveness with a DSLR.

    The downside is of course the size and the cost. Because these systems are so large they may attract unwanted attention as well.

    In the end, the user's skill level is the greatest contributing factor to the quality of images produced. Certainly there are some things that a digital compact cannot do, or cannot do as well as a DSLR would. This is why some still don't mind forking out extra cash for an SLR system. But if you give a skilled user a compact and a newbie a DSLR system coupled to a lens yielding the same focal length range, the photos out of a skilled user will be more intriguing and attractive, artistically, and perhaps in some cases, technically.

    If you get a chance to do more with less, or work with minimal equipment, give it a shot and it may be an eye-opener to you. I am about to do that myself...embark on a holiday with just a compact film camera, one kind of film and a fixed focal length lens. Even if the results turn out disastrous, at least I know I have tried.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,751

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    like what fword said, artistically its very possible but technically i would say impossible.
    compact cam might someday become better than dSLR now, but will not be able to catch up to those dSLR that are of the same generation as the compact cam itself.

  7. #7
    Senior Member yilishengxian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pandan 花园
    Posts
    3,925

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Maybe for size and convenience, compacts will always beat the DSLR.

    Image quality wise, unless they have developed a small sensor that is really good. My F30 gives really good images too.
    Every Photo Speaks for its Photographer. 开心就好。
    I wanna be the no.1 GWC !!!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Singapore, Bedok
    Posts
    1,785

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Quote Originally Posted by anglim
    Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR)?
    Of course!

    i can think of many situations off hand where a compact is the much better choice.

    Small prints, web prints, low ISO - it is virtually impossible to find any advantage on the dSLR side; the only advantage an SLR might have is better DOF control, ie the SLR can give thinner DOF.

    Macro situations - a compact has a much deeper DOF, due to its short focal length and small sensor. If you're not blowing up the picture to a large print, the compact wins hands down. And it doesn't hurt that some compacts have swivel LCDs, making those near and low shots a lot easier.

    Size and weight - a camera, no matter how expensive, is no good if it's too big or heavy to bring along. Travelling light, mountain climbing, trekking, cycling - try bringing that dSLR along.

    Less threatening - You may get better street shots with a tiny-looking camera; whipping out your 1DsmkII is likely to scare those cute little kids away. Some tourist places/events actually ban 'serious cameras' like SLRs but allow compacts.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Choa Chu Kang
    Posts
    1,759

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Depends who is using the camera?
    If a professional photographer using a compact digital and a newbie using a dslr?
    I think you should know the answer better than me.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    If "better" in terms of functions and image quality. Absolutely no way, man. Far from it. Not now and ever perhaps.

    Better in terms of portability, lightweight, then of cos, yes.

  11. #11
    Member Daniz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sing a pore
    Posts
    241

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Come think of it, using a P&S don't need high f stops for landscape, since the DOF is rarely shallow. With dslr, when you raise the f stop, gotta reduce shutter speed or bump up iso. That's 1 good point i can think of.

  12. #12
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Planet Nikon
    Posts
    3,539

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniz
    Come think of it, using a P&S don't need high f stops for landscape, since the DOF is rarely shallow. With dslr, when you raise the f stop, gotta reduce shutter speed or bump up iso. That's 1 good point i can think of.
    In low light areas without tripod, you can open wide a glass at f/2.8 and use hyperfocusing to achieve shallow DOF across the frame for landscape shots.

  13. #13
    Member Parka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    1,067

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Most of you are speaking from a photographer's point of view.

    From an audience's point of view, if they can't spot the difference, probably, there's really no difference in a compact P&S or DSLR

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Simei, Punggol Central
    Posts
    833

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    How can compact digital be better? Photoshop lo. Even better than DSLR. You can adjust contrast, sharpen, and reduce ISO. Composition not nice can crop till nice. So who is the winner?

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    sINgaPoRe
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Quote Originally Posted by anglim
    Read a recent in-depth comparison of 8MP Konica-Minolta Dimage A2 with 5MP Panasonic DMC-TZ1 dated 3 Jun 06 at

    http://vermeulen.ca/minolta-panasonic.html

    Perhaps, some compact digitals can actually be better than the bigger and more expensive DSLRs if not of their extra features. Any comments?
    You can read this http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...rnatives.shtml

  16. #16

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Well, this is another comparison that confirms we have arrived at the point in time when a good compact digital is able to produce picture comparable to many DSLR. Quite contrary to many who think good pictures are only from DSLR.

    Having said, that users of conpact digitals should be mindful of their limitation before trusting their camera in more serious shots.

    Quote Originally Posted by CompactRod

  17. #17
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    how about we do an expriment

    1. Pick a subject
    2. 1 week later post a picture

    and see if you can tell the DSLR and the P&S apart

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    1,191

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Quote Originally Posted by ortega
    how about we do an expriment

    1. Pick a subject
    2. 1 week later post a picture

    and see if you can tell the DSLR and the P&S apart
    By the way, how do u define a P & S camera?

    Some P & S are in the prosumer range.

  19. #19
    Moderator ortega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    23,686
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    non DSLR i think

    A Prosumer camera is a P&S with better features

  20. #20

    Default Re: Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    Can compact digital be better (than DSLR) ?

    No need to say, of course can one.

    Depends on what situation, condition, see?

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •