![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
|
This is my Trip to KuMing... comments pls
1) ![]() 2) ![]() 3) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 766
|
I'm going there next month, any advice on what lens to bring or any other travel tips?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
need to watch on the exposure. slight overexposed / burnt areas. usually when shooting flim/slides i will underexpose it.
and later handle them via photoshop. composition skills need polishing. like all starters, very snapish aka snap shotish.... get close to the action u might just get the shot u want. its not all about freezing the moment with every thing in sharp detail thou.... shoot more.....
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 103
|
I like the first one though the picture seems a little bit noisy. Is it because you were behind a window at that time?
btw, I think it should be KunMing instead of KuMing
__________________
EOS 30D, 17-40/F4L, 35/2, Planar 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 70-200/F4L IS, 580ex welcome to my gallery |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
usually for travel, pple will usually pack ultra WA lens and one more zoom.... for me. 17-35 and its good to go..... wide angles would be good..... what will you be shooting there first in the first place? ![]()
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
|
i haf asked him personally on this issue thou. and he stated several possiblities. first it was because i used ISO400 flim in broad daylight, and because i scanned the 4r photo directly via a scanner, thats why the grain or noise was visible... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
|
4)
![]() 5) ![]() 6) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sembawang
Posts: 1,080
|
#4 #5 #6
Pictures turned out to be noisy and white little spots spotted also. What ISO was used? And you might wanna blow away the dust with blower or lens tissue to get it off. And #5 you might wanna crop away the white stuff on the right. Last edited by versatile; 18th August 2006 at 11:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
as from Jeff_Tan, he told me that he used a normal ASA / ISO 400 flim is broad daylight, and under those lighting conditions, and scanning, grain would then be obvious. however if scanned directly via a flim scanner, the effect would be better at a price of the cost which i dun think he would want to do that. to my understanding, he is trying to keep cost low from not sending them for negatives scanning. ![]()
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
i believe many of us here would comment on the grain issue, and i havent seen anyone comment on issues like composition, technicalities of the picture like exposure and settings.
come on, besides the grain. ![]()
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 東京 Tokyo
Posts: 10,920
|
![]()
__________________
APAD |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 766
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
Sigma 10-20, 17-50 would be fine..... 28-75 would be redundant because it is already overlapping with the 17-50... i dun think its worth the extra weight too. the Tian Ya GND is ok. 420EX is ok la.... the weight will not kill you also.. 2 lens is fine.... but remember to bring lots of CF card or a image photo bank if necessary....
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
well... the 10-20 is a good bet. with the 70-200, it would be a good choice thou.... but if you had a 50 1.8 it would be good time to bring it out also.
if u think u can carry the extra weight u should bring the 70-200. well. its you after all..... usually pple who go travelling with tour groups. its usually a general zooms as highly likely u will not have time to stand there to compose the shot and think the whole day too.... ![]()
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 766
|
Thanks for the advice, luckily my 70-200 is a f4...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
SIA staff almost wanted to scream my heads off when i carried my 1st pack up because of my camera and equipments.. ![]()
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 766
|
Now that you mentioned, I hope my hand carried back-pack dont exceed the weight and size limit, I definitely do not want to check my equipment in... and oh no what about tripod??? The length is gonna exceed the limit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ClubSNAP
Posts: 5,553
|
tripod, monopod all very pointless to carry up because they are heavy, and take up space....
all these u dump in ur check-in bags. while things like camera, laptop n lenses and those wine and beer that u are bringing along, better hand carry up. and dun bring such a big bag up unless u know the person sitting beside u... or else it will be a bad start off for a holiday liao.... ![]()
__________________
blog. http://blog.touchstudios.com.sg |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|