![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upp Thomson
Posts: 1,188
|
![]() Shot this butterfly on one of my house plants with a 50mm lens. Not near enough so had to crop a lot to fill frame with main subject, hence the grainy look. Played around with curves in Nikon Capture until it went crazy and turned a different colour. Comments? Last edited by benedium; 15th August 2006 at 02:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upp Thomson
Posts: 1,188
|
So lousy that nobody wanna comment ah?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ole Fair Singapore
Posts: 58
|
Dude. Its psychedelic! I love it. Its freaking brilliant! Its pop art meets nature photography!
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upp Thomson
Posts: 1,188
|
Hehe...
Thanks for the comment. You are too kind. Anyway, my ad agency art director says my psychedelic one is manipulated in a bad way. He says prefers my original image... which is this one... ![]() So which is better? Original or Psychedelic? Last edited by benedium; 16th August 2006 at 11:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 661
|
psychedelic mannn~~~ haha, the original rendition is just way too plain... with all the post processing with the final rendition, i find it more suitable for maybe magazines or poster publications..
__________________
if my camera is there at the right moment, click, all I have to do is accept it. -edouard boubat |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upp Thomson
Posts: 1,188
|
Wah! So good meh?
Ok lah... Thanks for the encouraging comment! Any more critical comments? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hong Kong, Pokfulam
Posts: 1,195
|
i think it's good. but why did ur art director say it's bad?
__________________
Canon 300D, 30D, 5D. 17-40 f4 L, 24-105 f4 L, 70-200 f2.8 L IS |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ole Fair Singapore
Posts: 58
|
Still the crazy one man. Write a nice copy and send it to CCA.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upp Thomson
Posts: 1,188
|
I think designers tend to expect more from efforts made to touch up photographs.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 79
|
Of course the psychedelic one! The original image looks flat and the lighting conditions are not favourable. Everyone have their own preference. But in this case your art director really should start school all over again.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 19
|
One more vote for the psychedelic one from me as well. Have you tried doing it in mono? Either B&W or sepia or something like that?
btw, thanks for dropping by and posting in my first post! |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eastern Singapore
Posts: 628
|
Nice! first thought when I saw the butterfly...i thought the feelers were legs and there was some pixie / butterfly girl touching the flower!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Planet Jupiter
Posts: 564
|
not to discourage or anything, I think your art director has his point.....
the processed one look more like broccoli stems & the overall picture is kind of unbalanced in directing the veiwer's attention, butterfly is almost bleached, maybe the contrast to make the top more saturated to balance with the stock of botak broccoli. just my 2cts... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queen Astrid Park
Posts: 18
|
Psychedelic is definitely better than the original..
but.. your butterfly seem to have melted away with the light.. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ole Fair Singapore
Posts: 58
|
Interesting comments. I actually think now that the highlights could burn out some more. Go tot he extreme. It could look really dreamy and surreal which could be interesting. The saturation of the flower could be bumped up too ....actually as well as the stalk too. Add another texture filter over the image, maybe explore making it look like a polaroid tear out.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upp Thomson
Posts: 1,188
|
Wow! Thanks for all the super useful comments and tips.
I guess you guys are right. I may be able to improve the picture by separately increasing contrast and saturation for the top part of the picture or reducing the contrast and saturation for the bottom part of the picture. Looks like I have to resort to Photoshop liao... very weak in Photoshop. Scared... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ole Fair Singapore
Posts: 58
|
Why scared man? Always make sure you do a duplicate layer and work from there. So anything wrong, neen scared. I suppose you have a visualiser or FA artist in-house yes? Can get their help too. Or the Art Director that made the comment. Heh heh. In anycase, photoshopping translate to endless fun! Have fun mate. I'm sure we'll all be real keen to see the final result!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queen Astrid Park
Posts: 18
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|