Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 40

Thread: Price per performance L Lens

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    129

    Default Price per performance L Lens

    What you guyz think of Canon 70-200mm f/4L lens? Is it worth it?

  2. #2
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Planet Nikon
    Posts
    3,539

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Nope, get 70-200 IS f/2.8L

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    But the price is albeit too expensive. More than two times with an almost same optical quality

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,350

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by stjhie
    What you guyz think of Canon 70-200mm f/4L lens? Is it worth it?
    Yes. To a certain extent it is worth the money. But decide first what you intend to shoot with this lens and clarify what range you'll really need. Not sure what camera you've got. But on something like a 350D and a 30D, you'll get an equivalent of 112-320mm with your lens...quite a lot of reach.

    Assuming the range is right for you there may be a temptation to upgrade to a f/2.8 version (IS or non-IS) down the track. But if you primarily take photographs outdoors, the f/4 version is a mighty fine lens. Extremely sharp throughout the range even wide open, with great colour rendition. Not to mention that it's light and easy to carry around all day (and I mean it).

    In the past I used to have this lens but upgraded to something with a longer range because it didn't give me enough reach to get the shots I wanted at the zoo. Of course, it is long enough for full-body shots, but if you're looking to get tight head shots of even the large cats, you might be looking for something like a 300mm and beyond on a 1.6X FOV crop body.

    Have a think over it. But for raw value-for-money, the 70-200mm f/4L is very good indeed.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Ok, thanks fword. Any ideas on the Canon 70-300 IS (non DO and DO) ones? They are significantly smaller but I'm wishing for a "L" lens and a grey pro looking lens Are they sharp too as they have such a long range.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Hougang
    Posts
    598

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by stjhie
    Ok, thanks fword. Any ideas on the Canon 70-300 IS (non DO and DO) ones? They are significantly smaller but I'm wishing for a "L" lens and a grey pro looking lens Are they sharp too as they have such a long range.
    Definitely get a L... The 70-200 L has better image quality and faster AF(important for capturing things fast)... Of cos, the cons is $$$
    Clear Vision, Swift Action, Good Results.
    imouyang.multiply.com/photos

  7. #7

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    yup...definitely a great quality lens to have...

    then again...whether it is worth it or not really depends on your shooting interest and how you actually use it

  8. #8

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Get the 70-300 IS. Optics are great and it has got IS.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    I recently used my kit lens for a school soccer match. really hoped for a much better range.

  10. #10
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Planet Nikon
    Posts
    3,539

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by kraterz
    Get the 70-300 IS. Optics are great and it has got IS.
    70-300 IS cannot make it, get 70-200 f/2.8 IS L.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,350

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by _espn_
    70-300 IS cannot make it, get 70-200 f/2.8 IS L.
    To a certain extent this is true. The 70-300mm IS has the latest generation IS and also offers greater range than the 70-200mm f/4L. There are some reports of the lens producing soft images when the camera is used in the vertical format but Canon has supposedly caught onto the issue and will recallibrate these lenses at no cost.

    I haven't used the 70-300mm IS but suspect the image quality wouldn't be as good as the f/4L. Again it really depends on your application and how picky you are with IQ. The 70-300mm DO is certainly very attractive because it is small and compact. But after seeing several threads on this it appears that the performance is substandard and you should probably avoid that lens.

    The choice now would be between the 70-300mm IS and the 70-200mm f/4L, assuming your budget limits you as such or if your application depicts that these are what you really need. I urge you to consider what you really want to use the lens for and decide also what range you'll need.

    Bear in mind also that there's a rumour of an EF-S 16-200mm on the horizon, so you may want to hang back and watch for it if you're using a compatible camera.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by stjhie
    ...........an almost same optical quality
    u sure? ......
    always the Light, .... always.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    South Pole with Penguin
    Posts
    5,270

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    i dun think performance is something so easily to quantify.

    if you need it, mean you need it

    other than performance, i also look at its durability, resale value, compatibility with future bodies...etc
    We are HDD of PC & FT are MB add to storage;
    so PC never hangs with enormous storage capacity - LKY

  14. #14

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    There is not a linear relationship between cost and quality. For marginal increases in quality, usually in colour and contrast, you will pay significantly more. You can't say "it cost 2x, therefore I want 2x the quality" it just doesn't work that way.
    sk.images, ex - cyber_m0nkey

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    South Pole with Penguin
    Posts
    5,270

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by cyber_m0nkey
    There is not a linear relationship between cost and quality. For marginal increases in quality, usually in colour and contrast, you will pay significantly more. You can't say "it cost 2x, therefore I want 2x the quality" it just doesn't work that way.
    yah..sometimes the "performance" may be indirectly porportional to the price too

    50mm f1.8 - $100+
    50mm f1.4 - $500+
    50mm f1.0 - $5000+

    performance wise, the f1.0 is not sharp and the AF is slowest of all compare to f1.8 and f1.4

    similarly, the f1.4 also not very much sharper and faster than f1.8

    but i still love my f1.4 cos i can get something more useful at the price of f1.0
    Last edited by Wai; 31st July 2006 at 12:24 PM.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Oh, canon do make an f/1.0 lens? never seen before. haha. Let's just lay our hands on Canon 1200mm f/5.6

    http://www.dvinfo.net/canon/images/images17.php

    Treat to the eye!

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    2,922

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    The 70-200 F4L for outdoor events, street shoots, portraits and landscapes is more than enough for the average user. If you're not making money out of photography, I think its good bargain to get the F4 one. I am loving mine to bits. You can see some samples here:
    http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=209939

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Oh, Ok, great insight guys. Just to open for discussion, What other L lenses, not caring about focal lengths, has IS and about a reasonable under S$1500

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Clementi, Singapore
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by stjhie
    Oh, canon do make an f/1.0 lens? never seen before. haha. Let's just lay our hands on Canon 1200mm f/5.6

    http://www.dvinfo.net/canon/images/images17.php

    Treat to the eye!
    Sweet Lens! May have to go order one

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The 3rd Rock
    Posts
    1,269

    Default Re: Price per performance L Lens

    Quote Originally Posted by stjhie
    Oh, canon do make an f/1.0 lens? never seen before. haha. Let's just lay our hands on Canon 1200mm f/5.6

    http://www.dvinfo.net/canon/images/images17.php

    Treat to the eye!
    Looks like an anti-tank canon.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •