![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
this is my test result of Raynox DCR-1850 Pro teleconverter used on fujifilm s602z, all pic are taken in F11, shuttle speed of 2.5s-5s, from the same distance. no post-processing, only resized.
![]() this is taken at wide end. ![]() this is taken at tele end. ![]() this is taken at tele end + digital zoom ![]() with teleconverter, no UV, the vignetting is still ok for me... ^_^ the flare is due to long exposure under electric light? ![]() zoom half (or more a bit) the vignetting gone. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
![]() tele end + tele converter ![]() tele end + tele converter + digital zoom here are some pic of the lens: ![]() teleconverter with the free pouch, CD beside for size comparing. ![]() front view of the lens, no front filter thread... :-( ![]() back view of the lens... i think the lighting is poor, if i have time this weekend, may try more sample shots. the lens is a bit bigger than the DCR-1800, but quite satisfied of the quality. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
Cool! Been waiting to see these shots.
Are you gonna test for CA as well? |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
Btw, I think shooting some normal shots will do. It'll be good to see how this TC performs in normal situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 757
|
Chenwei, can you try shooting at f/2.8? I believe the CA is a lot worse at that apperture setting?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,513
|
Thanks Jeff Last edited by Jeff; 6th January 2003 at 08:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
![]() add on, today went to try CA, in fact, i am quite disappointing... the CA is considered serious for me, take a look here: also, the flare when ur lens got around 45 degree under sun light... however, it somehow produce perfect result i want... arh... think got to learn its behaviour and make full use of it... Last edited by chenwei; 6th April 2003 at 12:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
mm... will give it a try again... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 757
|
Yeah, the apperture setting does affect CA, usually there's a certain setting that gives the least CA, you can try it out and post some results. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
CA seems quite bad for the first few pics, but the last pic shows that it's still a pretty good TC. From what I read, CA can be avoided if you know the TC well and use it carefully.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|