![]() |
|
|||||||
| Underwater Photography All things nautically & photographically related. Dive in!! |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27
|
Hi guys
I can observe that most of the Underwater DSLR user will either carry 60 macro or 105 macro . Which type of lens is actually better ? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,318
|
hi frankie, welcome to the club
i found your question strangely familiar....did a search and lo and behold http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...ght=60mm+105mm eric |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CCK
Posts: 1,064
|
60 and 105 assumes a Nikon user. Canon users would be more like 50 and 100. Should be similar to the 60/105 debate, I think.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 714
|
Both serve different purpose and you cant really say which is better. Most serious u/w photograher has both lens. But if you are to start off with one, the 60 is the first to get. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27
|
I just start using DSLR underwater with Canon
consider EF S60mm f/2.8 Marco USM or EF100mm f/2.8 Marco USM after go through 60mm will be a good start for me who want to sell their 60mm f/2.8 lens (anybrand will do for me) please PM me . Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 863
|
I started using the 50/2.5 for about a year and then bought the 100/2.8 to complement my set-up. They both gave very good results, but it all depends also on the subjects available and your desired perspective.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|