View Poll Results: Is it okay to edit your photo?

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes .

    10 38.46%
  • No.

    16 61.54%
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Do you think it is okay to edit someone photo without his/her permission.

  1. #1

    Default Do you think it is okay to edit someone photo without his/her permission.

    Very often when someone post a photo, a member will edit his photo(color/brightness correction etc) and repost it without his/her mission.

    Do you this this is ethical?

    Maybe poster should add a line " Feel free to edit" in his post.

    whattya think?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    3,111

    Default Re: Do you think it is okay to edit someone photo without his/her permission.

    Originally posted by ninelives
    Very often when someone post a photo, a member will edit his photo(color/brightness correction etc) and repost it without his/her mission.

    Do you this this is ethical?

    Maybe poster should add a line " Feel free to edit" in his post.

    whattya think?
    I think permission should be seeked in advance prior to editing and repost.

    It's a form of courtesy...

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    South Pole with Penguin
    Posts
    5,270

    Default

    hmm....if it is not for commerical purpose, why not??

    Personally, i won't mind other pple edit my pic and re-post without asking, i will be very happy cos pple bother to help u to make the photo looks better and it is beneficial to everyone....

    if a member dun wish others to edit their photo...probably can state it in the post?

    I dunno abt others, but it will be the best to inform the owner, just a form of courtesy
    Last edited by Wai; 24th February 2002 at 03:12 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,911

    Default

    Technically, no. It's an infringement of copyright. The usual defences apply.
    Last edited by Jed; 24th February 2002 at 03:09 AM.

  5. #5

    Default

    The old SAF saying goes, do whatever you like, don't get caught. :P

  6. #6

    Default

    Maybe i am not clear enough. I mean someone may post a photo for critique, another member edit and repost it. His intention is good, he is trying to tell the poster a photo will have different effect or result by editing.

    Head over to Photo Galleries , you know wat I mean.

  7. #7
    Moderator ziploc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Snoopyland
    Posts
    4,577

    Default

    Actually personally I don't mind people editing my pictures on the intention to show me how I can make them better... using them for other purposes without asking is different case though... So my answer is yes & no.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Northwest
    Posts
    5,011

    Default

    Some people would mind and some people would not mind their photos being edited by others. So this should be a 2-way communication. There is no straight answer to whether it is OK or not OK to do so.

    My suggestions are:

    - The original poster to state clearly whether he/she grants permission for others to edit the picture.

    - The person editing the picture has to state exactly what is done to the picture, and his/her reason/s to do so. Otherwise it defeats the purpose. What's the point of just telling the original poster "your picture has some problems, my version is better, here it is." This is not helpful at all.

    - To establish a common standard of whether it is OK or not OK to edit if the poster did not specify. This is like the U-turn sign on the road. In Singapore, it is not OK to U-turn unless you are told otherwise. In US, it is OK to U-turn unless you are told not to. Following the Singapore convention, then it is not OK to edit unless permission is given explicitly byu the original poster.


    Thanks!

    Roy
    Last edited by roygoh; 5th March 2002 at 02:05 AM.
    As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision.

  9. #9
    Mouse
    Guests

    Default

    IMHO, I think the intent is important. If the purpose is like what NineLives said, in a forum with the owner's knowledge (whether before or after), to illustrate another perspective, I believe it is appriopriate. Unless the owner specifically state that he allows no tampering or whatsoever. As we all know, there exist numerous loopholes in the law.

    However, editing for commercial reasons or for personal matters without knowledge of owner, then I believe that to be an infringement of rights and ownership.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •