ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Fujifilm


 
Thread Tools
Old 31st December 2002   #1
jherek
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east
Posts: 548
Default set adaptor ring? yes/no?

wat difference does it make?
i can't tell...
jherek is offline  
Old 31st December 2002   #2
Revo
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore bo gway hai!
Posts: 465
Default Re: set adaptor ring? yes/no?

Quote:
Originally posted by jherek
wat difference does it make?
i can't tell...
Erm i think u lose the crosshair on the screen.....

Left the [ ] there oni....

By rite without it being on its [+] rite?
Revo is offline  
Old 31st December 2002   #3
chenwei
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
Default Re: Re: set adaptor ring? yes/no?

Quote:
Originally posted by Revo

Erm i think u lose the crosshair on the screen.....

Left the [ ] there oni....

By rite without it being on its [+] rite?
in fact i dun understand also, with or without make any diff to the pic taken?
chenwei is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 1st January 2003   #4
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

it just switch off the passive IR focus assist. when you have a lens on, the IR assist (located at the base of the flash) would not work properly cos it's blocked by the lens.
mpenza is offline  
Old 1st January 2003   #5
chenwei
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mpenza
it just switch off the passive IR focus assist. when you have a lens on, the IR assist (located at the base of the flash) would not work properly cos it's blocked by the lens.
in this case if we set to yes won't we lost some help on focusing? is it the reason if we set to yes we get slower auto focus?
chenwei is offline  
Old 1st January 2003   #6
jherek
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east
Posts: 548
Default

so in conclusion..

just set to no if ur using the adaptor ring w/o conversion lenses..

am i rite..?
jherek is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #7
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

i am thinking the IR assist will be blocked by a TC or WC anyway, whether you switch Adapter Ring on or off, as most of them measure 72mm minimum diameter, and directly in line with the IR assist.

Anyway, when i switch the Adapter Ring to On, the lens part seems to make a sound too, so perhaps there is something else going on other than the IR assist switching off.
fruitybix is offline  
Old 3rd January 2003   #8
jherek
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east
Posts: 548
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fruitybix

Anyway, when i switch the Adapter Ring to On, the lens part seems to make a sound too, so perhaps there is something else going on other than the IR assist switching off.
curiouser and curiouser...:
jherek is offline  
Old 3rd January 2003   #9
Lindy
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under the sea...
Posts: 190
Default

Lindy is offline  
Old 29th January 2003   #10
RedDevil7
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

hi guys! i've noticed something with regard 2 the adapter on/off setting thingy.

at max wa or tele, with the adapter ring physically attached 2 the cam n adapter setting put 2 "on"; the pic taken appears nearer or bigger.

if its set 2 "off", the pic appears slightly further away or smaller. no noticeable difference if the adapter ring is not attached 2 the cam when playing around with the on/off setting.

i dunno whether its part of the characteristic so maybe u guys can try it out n enlighten me. still very new 2 photography. cheers!
 
Old 29th January 2003   #11
chenwei
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RedDevil7
hi guys! i've noticed something with regard 2 the adapter on/off setting thingy.

at max wa or tele, with the adapter ring physically attached 2 the cam n adapter setting put 2 "on"; the pic taken appears nearer or bigger.

if its set 2 "off", the pic appears slightly further away or smaller. no noticeable difference if the adapter ring is not attached 2 the cam when playing around with the on/off setting.

i dunno whether its part of the characteristic so maybe u guys can try it out n enlighten me. still very new 2 photography. cheers!
wah first time heard of this.... tonite play play n see see...
chenwei is offline  
Old 29th January 2003   #12
RedDevil7
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

so nobody has noticed tis b4? maybe i could b wrong. its more noticeble at wa than tele. lemme noe after u've experimented. cheers!
 
Old 29th January 2003   #13
RedDevil7
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

btw check out the samples i took regarding tis issue. url is @ http://groups.msn.com/mazdaclubsinga...msnw?Page=Last

the 1st pic dscf0002 appears nearer, wider n bigger. dats with the setting "on". 2nd pic dscf0003 appears further, narrower n smaller. setting is "off".

Last edited by RedDevil7; 29th January 2003 at 09:30 PM.
 
Old 29th January 2003   #14
cillin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 419
Default

hmm... interesting
cillin is offline  
Old 30th January 2003   #15
RedDevil7
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

so has anyone else gave it a try?
 
Old 31st January 2003   #16
cillin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jurong West
Posts: 419
Default

Quote:
at max wa or tele, with the adapter ring physically attached 2 the cam n adapter setting put 2 "on"; the pic taken appears nearer or bigger.
The adapter ring is not the lens adapter (for eg 55-52 or 55-55mm) rite? Is there a tele or WA been attached?
cillin is offline  
Old 31st January 2003   #17
RedDevil7
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
originally posted by cillin

The adapter ring is not the lens adapter (for eg 55-52 or 55-55mm) rite? Is there a tele or WA been attached?
in fact i am referring 2 the lens adapter. no conversion lens attached when tis test is carried out.
 
Old 31st January 2003   #18
reflecx
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bishan
Posts: 762
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RedDevil7
btw check out the samples i took regarding tis issue. url is @ http://groups.msn.com/mazdaclubsinga...msnw?Page=Last

the 1st pic dscf0002 appears nearer, wider n bigger. dats with the setting "on". 2nd pic dscf0003 appears further, narrower n smaller. setting is "off".
I think the zoom was set differently for the 2 shots, which will explain the difference you stated.
reflecx is offline  
Old 1st February 2003   #19
RedDevil7
Guests
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
posted by reflecx

I think the zoom was set differently for the 2 shots, which will explain the difference you stated.
no leh. i zoomed out 2 the widest angle for my cam for both shots.
 
Old 12th February 2003   #20
Revo
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore bo gway hai!
Posts: 465
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RedDevil7


no leh. i zoomed out 2 the widest angle for my cam for both shots.
mmmm i just did a v simple test....

Did u make sure u zoom out to the widest each time u too the pic?

Cos sometimes the camera when switch off will auto zoom in a little at power up....

From my test....not wider or bigger...its the same.

Shld be quite accurate cos i did it on a tripod...
Revo is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.11930 seconds with 7 queries