ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Fujifilm


 
Thread Tools
Old 31st December 2002   #1
rncw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore / Japan
Posts: 1,969
Default HELP - 602 with TC - Is this normal???



help!!!

is this normal when 602 attached with the TC? this is before zooming...full zoom there are no vignetting...
__________________
...
rncw is offline  
Old 31st December 2002   #2
togu
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ToFusland
Posts: 5,563
Default

Yes, this appears on most of the cams too. You'll need to use full zoom.
togu is offline  
Old 31st December 2002   #3
rncw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore / Japan
Posts: 1,969
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by togu
Yes, this appears on most of the cams too. You'll need to use full zoom.
oh..so this is normal....
thanks
__________________
...
rncw is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 2nd January 2003   #4
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

It should completely disappear at about mid-zoom onwards.
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #5
chenwei
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
Default

try not to use UV when u use TC, it will help a bit.
chenwei is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #6
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by chenwei
try not to use UV when u use TC, it will help a bit.

speaking of UV filter.

I took some indoor shots with and without UV, shots look different. seems the UV shots had light brownish cast, as opposed to the shots without.

I thought that UV is not supposed to have any effect on indoor shots?
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #7
chenwei
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fruitybix

speaking of UV filter.

I took some indoor shots with and without UV, shots look different. seems the UV shots had light brownish cast, as opposed to the shots without.

I thought that UV is not supposed to have any effect on indoor shots?
it shouldn't be as i know, since it just "filter UV"... could it be ur auto-white balance?
chenwei is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #8
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by chenwei

it shouldn't be as i know, since it just "filter UV"... could it be ur auto-white balance?

will have to check, but what you said is also what i understand i.e. UV should have no impact on image.

by the way, know anything about scratch resistant filters? I know that most of us place a UV filter really to protect the lens. But is it also scratch resistant or is there a special filter for that?
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #9
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fruitybix
speaking of UV filter.

I took some indoor shots with and without UV, shots look different. seems the UV shots had light brownish cast, as opposed to the shots without.

I thought that UV is not supposed to have any effect on indoor shots?
Not supposed to have any effect. Anyway, what's the one you're using....
mpenza is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #10
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

Am using a cheapo filter, came as a bundle together with the OEM adapter. Cant quite remember the name.

btw, do you think the brands will have an effect? e.g. is Hoya really the one to get or is it just more popular with sellers?

Just bought 2 Raydawn polarisers myself, think they are pretty OK.
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #11
mpenza
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
Default

dunno. really good filters will be very clear and let most lights pass through without any alteration.... by right if there's slight alteration, the camera will take care of it too via the white balance function...
mpenza is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #12
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

there is really much to learn about this camera specifically and about photography in general. i think the 602Z will be with me for a little while more..

by the way, know anything about an omnibounce for the Metz 32? seems that AP does not have it.. are you using one curently? and how do you find it?
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #13
imaginary_number
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fruitybix

by the way, know anything about an omnibounce for the Metz 32? seems that AP does not have it.. are you using one curently? and how do you find it?
Bought one from CP @ $28.50.
imaginary_number is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #14
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by imaginary_number


Bought one from CP @ $28.50.

when i bounce my flash, how do i watch out for the cast? e.g. beige coloured ceilings.

Thanks!!
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #15
imaginary_number
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fruitybix



when i bounce my flash, how do i watch out for the cast? e.g. beige coloured ceilings.

Thanks!!
Use custom white balance if colour cast proves to be a problem for you.

I usually don't bother 'coz I always do post-processing in PS.
imaginary_number is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #16
fruitybix
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by imaginary_number


Use custom white balance if colour cast proves to be a problem for you.

I usually don't bother 'coz I always do post-processing in PS.

Thanks!

by the way, going for SEED?
fruitybix is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #17
chenwei
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,290
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by imaginary_number

Use custom white balance if colour cast proves to be a problem for you.

I usually don't bother 'coz I always do post-processing in PS.
but if the cast is too serious not possible to fix in PS also right?
chenwei is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #18
imaginary_number
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fruitybix



Thanks!

by the way, going for SEED?
Yup. It's Club Snap's bday leh
imaginary_number is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #19
imaginary_number
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by chenwei

but if the cast is too serious not possible to fix in PS also right?
So far, I haven't encountered such a serious cast yet actually. Btw, I've been covering indoor events with orangey lighting.

Maybe if you get such a shot, you can send it to me. Would like to know too.
imaginary_number is offline  
Old 2nd January 2003   #20
Zerstorer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,610
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by chenwei

but if the cast is too serious not possible to fix in PS also right?
Yes. It can be rather tedious and you may not get all the colours balanced even after tweaking with the variations and hue/saturation tools.

Best is to set custom white balance whenever possible so that you will be as close to the natural colour as possible for minimal tweaking.

In cases such as when you underexpose by 1stop, it is almost impossible to tweak the colours back to normal after boosting the levels.
Zerstorer is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13565 seconds with 7 queries