Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 59

Thread: Cries of foul play for photographer

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    174

    Default Cries of foul play for photographer

    Confidence is thinking you'll be Champions, arrogance is stating it.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    I'm a Llama!
    Posts
    4,751

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    That's kinda strange considering kids are made to cry for films, commercials, photoshoots etc... all the time.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    I like her idea and I find nothing wrong with it.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    well....always remember that Americans tend to be extremist, whatever small small thing would be amplified by many folds. but for this crying incident, you can take it as an argument of whether invoking terror and fear in adolescents is worth a photograph.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    And no matter if the argument is positive or negative, her photos will be valued more. Hehe. Good for the photographer, in a way.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    East of Singapore
    Posts
    1,750

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    when a child cries for a commercial, film or print advertisement, the child and the parent knows what to expect. They go for the shoot/filming with their eyes open knowing that they have to cry for their money. It is a job which they are train to do and it is a commercial transaction.

    In this case it is diff. In the words of the photographer, she said that she gave the child a lollypop and than take it away, make the parent leave the room ( making the child fearful of being left behind ), in order to make the child cry for the sole purpose of her personal fulfillment of shooting something "diff". She even have the cheek to try to justify her actions by saying that she's doing this to describe how she feels about the Bush's Administration: frustration, fear, and angry. Which, clearly states that this is a personal statement, a personal project. The key word here is "PERSONAL". And after this Personal project is complete, she sells the images for US4500.00 each. And when she get blasted for it, she first make a complain to try to get it to stop, failling which she proclaim that the reaction are a testament to the power of the/her still images.
    And the parent who allow their childern to be subjected to this kind of treatment.......
    I think they all should be arrested, hand over to some hooligans who hate ang-mo for a few days to give them a taste of their own medicine.

    We're talking about a poor, helpless child here!!!
    I get paid more shooting part time ...... damn, I should find more time to shoot part time

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,164

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    I think its more on sensationalizing and collective occurance. Same thing that 10 people dying in 1 accident seems worst than 10 separate accidents with 1 person died in each of them.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by dawgbyte77
    I think its more on sensationalizing and collective occurance. Same thing that 10 people dying in 1 accident seems worst than 10 separate accidents with 1 person died in each of them.
    well, in this case, 1 child for 1 photograph.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,164

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by satay16
    well, in this case, 1 child for 1 photograph.
    But combined together it becomes a series and therefore influence the viewer to how he should react.

    Anyway, I also do not see anything wrong with it and crying doesn't mean terror. Taking the lollipop away is more indignation than fear. As my example above, some teachers and parents still believe in caning and corporal punishments on their kids. On the other hand, I know a lot of parents who pretend going away and leaving the kid to "strangers" like uncles or friends, and see how the child react. In this case, all the children are related to the photographer as friend or relative. For the personal and commercial aspect, since I do not believe she did something morally wrong, then gaining from it doesn't make it wrong as well. So depends on how a situation is focused, it can either be accepted as right or wrong. No such thing as universal truth so there will always be 2 camps in every situation.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by yqt
    when a child cries for a commercial, film or print advertisement, the child and the parent knows what to expect. They go for the shoot/filming with their eyes open knowing that they have to cry for their money. It is a job which they are train to do and it is a commercial transaction.

    In this case it is diff. In the words of the photographer, she said that she gave the child a lollypop and than take it away, make the parent leave the room ( making the child fearful of being left behind ), in order to make the child cry for the sole purpose of her personal fulfillment of shooting something "diff". She even have the cheek to try to justify her actions by saying that she's doing this to describe how she feels about the Bush's Administration: frustration, fear, and angry. Which, clearly states that this is a personal statement, a personal project. The key word here is "PERSONAL". And after this Personal project is complete, she sells the images for US4500.00 each. And when she get blasted for it, she first make a complain to try to get it to stop, failling which she proclaim that the reaction are a testament to the power of the/her still images.
    And the parent who allow their childern to be subjected to this kind of treatment.......
    I think they all should be arrested, hand over to some hooligans who hate ang-mo for a few days to give them a taste of their own medicine.

    We're talking about a poor, helpless child here!!!
    I disagree. But I can accept your point of view.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Pablo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Blue/Green Planet
    Posts
    1,854

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    For those that agree with it and see nothing wrong, I have one question....

    Would you do it ? to either your children or others for the sake of taking a photo.

    Hey, if you would do this, post your nick so that I can add it to my ignore list.
    Time, is an effortless construction :)

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,164

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by Pablo
    For those that agree with it and see nothing wrong, I have one question....

    Would you do it ? to either your children or others for the sake of taking a photo.

    Hey, if you would do this, post your nick so that I can add it to my ignore list.
    Wow! You're taking it too personal. Yes I would.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    East of Singapore
    Posts
    1,750

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by Caspere
    I disagree. But I can accept your point of view.
    Thank you. I'm glad we can agreed to disagreed.
    I get paid more shooting part time ...... damn, I should find more time to shoot part time

  14. #14

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by dawgbyte77
    Wow! You're taking it too personal. Yes I would.
    i would too!

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    東京 Tokyo
    Posts
    10,193

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    thanks for sharing the article

    after some thought i disagree with the method used by the photographer

    what puzzled me is the possible lack of knowledge of fear management in children as shown by the photographer when dealing with a topic as such. a lollipop probably means nothing to an adult but it can mean the whole world to a child. a child administered with fear and not properly 'debriefed' of the situation can leave long lasting psychological effects.
    Last edited by eikin; 12th July 2006 at 06:06 PM.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Punggol 21
    Posts
    967

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    I think if it is a deliberate act to make a child cry, it's sick. If its spontaneous than its beautiful.

    I don't blame the photog coz its a business for her and they have agreement with the parents, I blame the parents.

    I am a parent, and I would'nt let anything like that done to my child. Imagine someone paying you to make your child cry and feel distress in the name of money. Imagine if you are the child.


    If you call that art, I'll call that crap.
    I lup SG, but SG don't love me...

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    East of Singapore
    Posts
    1,750

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by dawgbyte77
    But combined together it becomes a series and therefore influence the viewer to how he should react.

    Anyway, I also do not see anything wrong with it and crying doesn't mean terror. Taking the lollipop away is more indignation than fear. As my example above, some teachers and parents still believe in caning and corporal punishments on their kids. On the other hand, I know a lot of parents who pretend going away and leaving the kid to "strangers" like uncles or friends, and see how the child react. In this case, all the children are related to the photographer as friend or relative. For the personal and commercial aspect, since I do not believe she did something morally wrong, then gaining from it doesn't make it wrong as well. So depends on how a situation is focused, it can either be accepted as right or wrong. No such thing as universal truth so there will always be 2 camps in every situation.
    Yes, there'll always be 2 camps to every issue and I respect you views. Just so happen that we're on opp. side on this issue.
    The issue here which I can't stand is that this is done to a child with the intension of fulfilling a personal interest as well as to make money at the expense of a child who have no clue at all what is happening. Do you think it would be so diff. for her to get professional child models/talents to do this personal project of hers? Do you think she could not afford the cost of the child models/talents
    When I cane my child ( happen twice ) it is because I have to impress upon him the importance of the error that he have done. Not to fulfill my own interest nor to earn any money out of the caning.
    If I were to leave my child alone in public/the company of strangers ( which, luckily for me, I did not need to do ), it is to instill in him some fear so that they will not wander off on their own when we go out.
    Maybe it is because I'm a parent, maybe because my kids have cause me to become a big softy, but the way it looks, at least to me, it is just a photographer fulfilling her own desire to do something diff, to make a PERSONAL point, to stand out but have fail to consider the feelings of the child. After all she did said that she did not say anything to the child except " hello, good bye and maybe I'm sorry". This is cold man.
    Even if I'm doing a paying shoot, where the child model/talent knows what to expect and is paid to it, I'll not put fear into a child.
    I have been able to get the job done without resorting to making a child feeling fearful.
    Last edited by yqt; 12th July 2006 at 06:22 PM.
    I get paid more shooting part time ...... damn, I should find more time to shoot part time

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    東京 Tokyo
    Posts
    10,193

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by Sjourn
    I think if it is a deliberate act to make a child cry, it's sick. If its spontaneous than its beautiful.

    I don't blame the photog coz its a business for her and they have agreement with the parents, I blame the parents.

    I am a parent, and I would'nt let anything like that done to my child. Imagine someone paying you to make your child cry and feel distress in the name of money. Imagine if you are the child.


    If you call that art, I'll call that crap.
    no one says it better than you towkay

  19. #19

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    i dun know why there are pp that actually finds it nothing wrong with it, but i dun understand. at the end, nothing productive comes out from it. you dun create an art piece from pp to enjoy, you dun create a journalistic photograph that informs pp. all you created is just a terrorized child + controversy + sadistic enjoyment from paedophiles. all this rubbish about depicting the child to a bush administration just doesn't make sense, if it make sense for some reason. i believe taking naked children crying would help solving the poverty in africa? PURE RUBBISH!! ART SHOULD NOT BE CARRIED TO THE EXTENT OF CAUSING EVEN THE SLIGHTEST SENSE OF PHYSICAL OR PHYSCHOLOGICAL HARM TO PEOPLE!!!!! DUN SAY THAT THE CHILD ISN'T TERRORIZED!!!! PROBLEM WITH THE ARTICLE IS THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE CHILD SHOWN!!!! REMEMBER, HE TOOK MUCH MORE THAN ONE!!!!
    Last edited by satay16; 12th July 2006 at 06:52 PM.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Cries of foul play for photographer

    Quote Originally Posted by satay16
    i dun know why there are pp that actually finds it nothing wrong with it, but i dun understand. at the end, nothing productive comes out from it. you dun create an art piece from pp to enjoy, you dun create a journalistic photograph that informs pp. all you created is just a terrorized child + controversy + sadistic enjoyment from paedophiles. all this rubbish about depicting the child to a bush administration just doesn't make sense, if it make sense for some reason. i believe taking naked children crying would help solving the poverty in africa? PURE RUBBISH!! ART SHOULD NOT BE CARRIED TO THE EXTENT OF EVEN CAUSING PHYSICAL AND PHYSCHOLOGICAL HARM TO PEOPLE!!!!! DUN SAY THAT THE CHILD ISN'T TERRORIZED!!!! PROBLEM WITH THE ARTICLE IS THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE CHILD SHOWN!!!! REMEMBER, HE TOOK MUCH MORE THAN ONE!!!!

    i agree the content is crap (bush rubbish) but really i dun think you can baby a baby so much. Some babies can really cry so it takes little effort to start them and babies cry for all reasons, to make it sound making a baby cry will drama (trama) them for life, WHOA! Please keep your little kid at home and dun bring them out!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •