![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
Hi all...I have not bought it yet (neither the lens adaptor nor the S3 =p) but just wanted to ask those who have.
For me, I think the zoom is quite long so would it be good to have the macro adapter thing on all the time to enjoy the wider view and just take it off when the need for telephoto arises? Actually does the picture quality drop with extra stuff added? thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 241
|
Not sure about other macro converters or the macro filters though. If what you want is a wider view, mebbe you should be looking at a wide converter instead. Last edited by boogle; 6th July 2006 at 12:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sembawang Road, Singapore
Posts: 1,936
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,086
|
yeahz.. wif e macro lens on, u canT take normal scenery shots and all. nid to remove it before u can take such pics.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
My bad! Guess I got confused between macro and wide-angle lens..sorry! thanks for trying to help though..
let me rephrase...i believe it should be the wide angle lens (a canon adaptor thingy is needed as well i think) which would half? the zoom range so i guess it would be better for shooting landscapes, seeing more stuff etc? does this reduce quality or something? thanks once again! sorry for the confusion...not that used to all the terms (there's a macro lens as well is it?or is it a macro mode on the camera?) cheers ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,086
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
Thanks NightZ88!
i think it's more of a being lazy thing so like leaving the wide angle lens on most of the time and still taking photos normally (effectively having a lens with 12x zoom but a lower starting range and inferior quality?) And only taking the additional lens off should the need arise for the further telephoto activity. i guess what i'm asking is sort of like buying a UV filter to cover a dslr lens? where you just leave it on all the time to protect the lens instead of putting the lens cover...resulting in one being able to take photos anytime without the need for taking things off...am i right? so something similar i guess? |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
Even with the UV filter, you still need to have the lens cap on for protection. The UV filter is there just in case you scratch it, you can replace it cheaply relative to the lens or the S3 in this case.
But please that note that the coating on the UV lens is very vunerable, once scratched, you pic won't be nice. It is definitely not to be a lens cap substitute woh....
__________________
My Flickr Account |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sembawang Road, Singapore
Posts: 1,936
|
You cannot zoom all the way out with most Wide Converters. They work fine on the wider sider of the camera. Look at the lensmate pictures. So you cannot leave it on all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
Thanks last boltnut and cerebrus! get it now ...only put it on when needed then! i suppose leaving the lens adapter on is ok but not the wide angle lens or a filter!
by the way, what is the difference between the 52mm and the 58mm? from the website cerebrus mentioned 52mm seems to be a better fit/produce better pictures than the 58mm...especially with their lens but if assuming manufacturers know their product (they do..well enough yah? ) , they only have 58mm lens adapters and lenses is it? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sembawang Road, Singapore
Posts: 1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 64
|
hm.. one thing i dont understand is why 52mm seems to be better when the original adapters and lens from canon are 58mm...
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sembawang Road, Singapore
Posts: 1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,419
|
Hi,
I am quoting Felixcat8888 post #413 from the S3 Accessories Thread, he was explaining why the lensmate website says the 58mm WC is not good compared to a 52mm:
__________________
My Flickr Account |
||
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
All in I guess different adaptors with different lenses would produce varying results? =) mayb I should just get the camera first and play around with it before buying anything else...who knows mayb it's sufficient on its own?
think it costs bout 750sgd now right from one of those shops like cathay/alan photo and all? read that in one of the really long S3 threads or mayb i'm mistaken ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sembawang Road, Singapore
Posts: 1,936
|
Think it is around SGD$750 now. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|