Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    See here for more details.

    Sigh... Another good RAW engine gone...

  2. #2

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    not necessarily a bad thing..

    adobe is pioneering a universal raw standard... which may come in useful one day when xyz camera company no longer supports its proprietary format.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    270 degree of Singapore
    Posts
    6,741

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    but now $$$
    Sony Alpha 700 hobbyist

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    sewage drain/manhole
    Posts
    5,011

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    This is bad enough "RawShooter Premium will be discontinued"

  5. #5

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    is quite a good software .. might want to DL it before is gone

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    sewage drain/manhole
    Posts
    5,011

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by simon80
    is quite a good software .. might want to DL it before is gone
    hmm.... careful hor

  7. #7

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    is free ..

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by jdredd
    not necessarily a bad thing..

    adobe is pioneering a universal raw standard... which may come in useful one day when xyz camera company no longer supports its proprietary format.
    BTW, DNG is just an attempt to capture more market share and not really for the above reason. If they stop supporting, well, you can either 1) archive the old program that can read the files with the images or 2) like with DNG, convert to a more universal format like TIFF or even PSD or PNG.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cons digger.
    Posts
    3,924

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    I dun see anything wrong with DNG. If it becomes a industry standard like TIFF or JPEG and all camera makers adhere to the standard it'll be beneficial for everyone.

    BUT if DNG is going to be another properietary RAW format jsut for Adobe then I think the world can do with one less closed-door/encrypted/paid system.
    “How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.” - Adolf Hitler

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by yanyewkay
    I dun see anything wrong with DNG. If it becomes a industry standard like TIFF or JPEG and all camera makers adhere to the standard it'll be beneficial for everyone.

    BUT if DNG is going to be another properietary RAW format jsut for Adobe then I think the world can do with one less closed-door/encrypted/paid system.
    There is nothing majorly wrong with it except that the user may now be at the mercy of Adobe. I'm not sure of the licensing condition for the current version, but then, they can come up with new version that can give you major problem if you are not using their software.

    If anyone really wants to debate about the pros and cons of DNG, DPReview has a few threads on it...

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Dreamy Nikon Land
    Posts
    2,874

    Talking Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Aren't we already living in the mercy of Bill Gates anyway?

    I support Adobe, cos then I will be getting more value for my money when I get the CS2 Original (Or CS3) in years to come!
    Andy Ang :lovegrin: - "A Photo speaks a thousand words. Have you spoken today?"
    APAD | Blog

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Ang
    Aren't we already living in the mercy of Bill Gates anyway?

    I support Adobe, cos then I will be getting more value for my money when I get the CS2 Original (Or CS3) in years to come!
    Well, my impression is that MacOS and Linux and OpenOffice are viable alternative. Is there one for CS2?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cons digger.
    Posts
    3,924

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    GIMP? it's good enough for me to get by my simple exposure/colour fixing. All the tools I use are available.
    “How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.” - Adolf Hitler

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by yanyewkay
    GIMP? it's good enough for me to get by my simple exposure/colour fixing. All the tools I use are available.
    GIMP? For you may be. But tell me when it has the same color management, especially LAB and CMYK...

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cons digger.
    Posts
    3,924

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    saw that coming. I knew that colour management part was going to be the issue (probably the only issue with GIMP). GIMP itself doesn't have CYMK layer seperation but there are plugins for that. ICC softproofing is also available via plugins. It'll probably be a little hassle to download plugins seperately but at least they get the job done.

    GIMP is still quite in its infancy so I don't expect it to have all the bells and whistles compared to a giant like Adobe..furthermore, it's FREE. Still, I doubt many in here use like more than 20% of photoshop's available tools or do pre-press stuff that require strict CYMK standards or a powerful/accurate colour management engine.

    then again.. when DNG takes off.. will adobe open up it's standards for open source developers like GIMP to use?
    “How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.” - Adolf Hitler

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cons digger.
    Posts
    3,924

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by Watcher
    Well, my impression is that MacOS and Linux and OpenOffice are viable alternative. Is there one for CS2?
    anyway, if adobe buys over pixmantec, they'll absorb their technology and can make a better version of photoshop in future wun it? It'll be better for Photoshop supporters and users also no?
    “How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.” - Adolf Hitler

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by yanyewkay
    anyway, if adobe buys over pixmantec, they'll absorb their technology and can make a better version of photoshop in future wun it? It'll be better for Photoshop supporters and users also no?
    There are bets that they buy them out to eliminate a competitor...

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by yanyewkay
    saw that coming. I knew that colour management part was going to be the issue (probably the only issue with GIMP). GIMP itself doesn't have CYMK layer seperation but there are plugins for that. ICC softproofing is also available via plugins. It'll probably be a little hassle to download plugins seperately but at least they get the job done.

    GIMP is still quite in its infancy so I don't expect it to have all the bells and whistles compared to a giant like Adobe..furthermore, it's FREE. Still, I doubt many in here use like more than 20% of photoshop's available tools or do pre-press stuff that require strict CYMK standards or a powerful/accurate colour management engine.

    then again.. when DNG takes off.. will adobe open up it's standards for open source developers like GIMP to use?
    It doesn't even have a mature healing brush (under construction currently)!

    It is still in infancy but others need functionality now.

    DNG will not go very far unless Canon and/or Nikon supports it.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cons digger.
    Posts
    3,924

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by Watcher
    It doesn't even have a mature healing brush (under construction currently)!

    It is still in infancy but others need functionality now.
    Everyone got to start somewhere
    Quote Originally Posted by Watcher
    DNG will not go very far unless Canon and/or Nikon supports it.
    Totally agreed. But being the 2 major competitors, if either brand supports it and uses it for their marketing tool, the other brand will definitely delay the take up or not take it up at all.

    Either way, we are all at the mercy of coroprate giants.
    “How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.” - Adolf Hitler

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The heart of the Abyss
    Posts
    2,307

    Default Re: Adobe Buys over Pixmantec

    Quote Originally Posted by yanyewkay
    Everyone got to start somewhere
    Yes, but the point is today, it is not really a viable replacement for PS. For many, things like healing brush, native LAB model, sophisticated CM and CMYK modes are essential for the use, especially pros and semi-pros. Today, for photographers, Macs can replace Windows machine. The same cannot be said for Gimp vs PS.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •