![]() |
|
|||||||
| Macros and Close-ups The small world brought large. Photos of tiny things, from critters to exotic items. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
Pictures are taking in various location. C&C all welcome.
All pics in reversed-mount with either 50mm or 28-70mm. #1 (Punggol Park) ![]() 1/45s, ISO100, ext. flash, handheld #2 (Punggol Park) ![]() 1/45s, ISO100, ext. flash, handheld #3 (Punggol Park) ![]() 1/45s, ISO100, ext. flash, handheld, (stack-mounted-70mm with 50mm reversed, F22) #4 (Bishan - St.13) ![]() 1/80s, ISO800, ext. flash, handheld |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
#5 (Bishan - st.13)
![]() 1/90s, ISO800, ext. flash, handheld #6 (Bishan - st.13) ![]() 1/90s, ISO800, ext. flash, handheld #7 (Punggol - Matilda House) ![]() 1/45s, ISO100, ext. flash, handheld #8 (Punggol - Matilda House) ![]() 1/45s, ISO100, ext. flash, handheld Thanks for viewing ![]() Last edited by Qazwer; 18th June 2006 at 10:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,329
|
#1 is good composition but some aberrations there? The pinkish and greenish patch in the middle of the picture. Seems quite noisy though u used it at ISO100.
#3 is overexposed but nice catch of spider eating fly..didnt know that! #7 and #8 is good and sharp. Rest of the picture like a bit soft. maybe handshake. Try a bit of PP to boost the colors! REgards, tltan |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,958
|
They are still quite soft. Do you do any photo editing? Perhaps some sharpening using USM may help.
The greens on the right side of #1 and #2 look very odd. #3 is a good moment captured, but flash is abit harsh. Composition wise, I will go for #4. Hope you don't mind my comments... ![]()
__________________
My Gallery: http://www.tchuanye.smugmug.com/ Eqpt: http://www.tchuanye.smugmug.com/gallery/271702 |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
#1 & #2 is too under-exposed. After PP the pics, it appeared okay in my computer. So, didn't bother to do Neat Image. I truly agree on soft focus or OOF cos quite difficult to focus using reverse-mount method. thinking of changing approach.Anyway, thanks again. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
By the way, #4 is cropped from the bigger pics to show the subject. Anyway, all points are well taken note of. As for USM, do you mean the Ultrasonic thingy or from another software? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,958
|
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...ding-usm.shtml
__________________
My Gallery: http://www.tchuanye.smugmug.com/ Eqpt: http://www.tchuanye.smugmug.com/gallery/271702 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
Ohh okay. Will have to explore this filter. Thanks for the tips!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 656
|
I would say all these photo look soft. 1 & 2 were underexposure, the quality of these two photo also look funny, did you crop it heavily?
BTW it is always not easy to use reverse lens mount. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
I can bet you on the softness. I guess I have to try on the USM as what tchuanye had told me when get back home today. It's really a challenge to take with handheld reverse-mount. By the way, thanks for the comments. ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|