![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Here and Now
Posts: 1,106
|
Anyone know what the advantages are of connecting a photo-printer with USB 2.0 cable versus a parallel cable?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
ClubSNAP Idol
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Jalan Suka
Posts: 5,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Here and Now
Posts: 1,106
|
Anyone? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,895
|
I think what adam meant was a faster transfer rate
In fact, I also think that the key (and perhaps only) advantage of USB 2.0 over parallel is a faster transfer rate. But usually, the bottleneck is at the printer's end. I think it'll be a better idea to just stick with your old cable. Juz my 2 cents. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 708
|
Well, USB's connector is smaller, you can connect multiple devices, it is more high tech and thus cooler instead of boring old usb, and oh - You can't use parellel ports in some mobos like the Abit -MAX series cos they don't have the physical ports.
![]() Seriously, the USB port will speed up printing. Not the raw print speed (may affect but seriously, minor effect), but more onn the responsiveness, faster deleting of print jobs, faster start printing, etc. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kangaroo land
Posts: 910
|
With USB 2.0 you can transfer 480 mbps of data in a zif
with Paralel I think you can only transfer around 115200 bps of data [ that is 0.1 mbps ] But for a Soho photo printer, I think USB 2.0 and Paralel will not make any difference as the photo printer memory is less than 4 mbps anyway ? But if you are talking like HP Laserjet Laser colour printer or even the Hi-capacity laser printer with 160 megs of RAM [ the VERY big sized printers ] , USB 2.0 will make a difference As they are not connected using a Paralel cable anymore but a 10/100 Mbps network card ![]() =bob= |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,312
|
This is what I read from DPReview forum
I am not too sure about other OS but this is a true fact acknowledged by MS. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,312
|
I forget to mention that the above mentioned "100% CPU usage" problem applies to the following Win OSes
Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP1 Microsoft Windows XP Professional Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition SP1 Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional SP1 Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional SP2 Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional SP3 |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
![]() Regards CK |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: BB
Posts: 2,622
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Down-Below, Babylon 5
Posts: 116
|
![]() red pills give different results ![]() ... but those results *should* still better than ur traditional P|| cable transfer rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Here and Now
Posts: 1,106
|
Thanks guys for the enlightment. Now I see there's no overwhelming reason for me to go through the troubles of utilizing the USB 2.0 port.
I am still using the good old Win 98 and my printer is a SOHO class printer so I am sure it is still a bottle-neck in itself. So far I haven't noticed any pause when printing A4 size color photos even when I play MP3 at the same time. I think I'll keep using the ancient Parallel port. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Suzhou, China
Posts: 242
|
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definit...756825,00.html and also this link for more technical detail http://www.fapo.com/1284int.htm ultimately, the parallel port is not a bad interface... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bukit Panjang
Posts: 731
|
just a question on the same topic...say if i were to purchase an external casing to fit a 2.5" hard drive to be used on a laptop, would a firewire or USB2 connection draw more battery power from the laptop in order for the hard drive to operate? What would be a more recommended connection for faster transfer speeds, power saving..etc?
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,312
|
Check this Microsoft page about the Parallel port issue.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kangaroo land
Posts: 910
|
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Western SG
Posts: 1,507
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|