![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,051
|
Hi Pals..
I just recently looking for a close to 24mm FOV solution on a prime and got hold of a Minolta 16mm Fish-Eye. Well due to the fish eye distortion, the out of the camera image from this lens may not be that great as there are some distortion. Well after a couple of weeks of research on the web, i finally found a couple of solution and finally come to use this plug-in by Richard Rosenman (check out his websit and works in DI.....ooooohh!!! power!!!). Here is the defished image using the lens distortion correction plug-in by Richard Rosenman. I guess..if it works for the Minolta 16mm. Then it should work too for the others like the Zenitar. After: ~24mm FOV ![]() And here is a quick compare output of the 18-200 at widest. The amount of information in the frame is quite significant. ~28mm FOV ![]() Comparison by direct Overlapping: ![]() *Notice how well the edge of the building just mate over. Well again, output & effectiveness will vary from image ot image especially when there are subjects closeby in the edges - with different distortion levels. And another challenging one with more lines....in odd angles. Before: ![]() After: ![]() You can get a few great plug-ins from Richard Rosenman's website.....and best of all its free!!!... His Works: http://www.richardrosenman.com His Free Plugins: http://www.richardrosenman.com/software/downloads/
__________________
Visit my website.... http://www.md-sulhan.com Last edited by sulhan; 11th June 2006 at 06:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
now you know why i love the fisheye?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 270 degree of Singapore
Posts: 6,700
|
![]() But fisheye on film still unbeatable.
__________________
Sony Alpha 700 hobbyist |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Eropagnis
Posts: 2,977
|
I love u baby....
![]()
__________________
"Wonders of the Human Mind. Unfathomable to the highest degree." |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,051
|
Okay... Who love who?.....Wahahahah!!!
__________________
Visit my website.... http://www.md-sulhan.com |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,977
|
i thought we buy fisheye because we want fisheye?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 702
|
Personally, i am more a frog leg person : ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,619
|
By "distortion", if you are refering to the curve straight line, it's not distortion at all. Fish-eye lens by design will have that characteristic. If you are looking for lens that can capture straight line as straight you will need to look for wide angle lens that is "rectilinear" in design.
__________________
More photos @ myPhotos Album |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,051
|
Well i am just using laymans term here for describing the before and after shot. The before shot, well its distorted because its based on a "cut-out" version of the fish eye lens. Well what ever it is... ah-hong , ah-heng, amat and ali would probably call the original output distorted. So the workflow to get a less-distorted image would be using software - which is cut to do just that. My goal is also to share the software that i found with others who may be using the 16mm Zenitar or the km one. I just do not favor the 12-24/11-18's as i use the fish-eye for film too.....and future full frame - if it ever hit the streets...
__________________
Visit my website.... http://www.md-sulhan.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|