![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hello all,
I took my 20D in for a sensor clean today and had a good chat with the camera tech. Apart from other things discussed (like $83 is a lot to pay for a clean ), I mentioned dead pixels."I had noticed a few either HOT or dead pixels when zooming in on a night photo I had taken". I had also mentioned that I have used the camera for IR and that exposure times have been quite long. He then said that the cause of the faulty pixels is likely due to long exposure times because they can tend to cook if long exposures are used frequently. What are your thoughts on this ? .... and Panda, I am not trying to scare you As some may know, I don't use the 20D for IR now but use a D70 because of the MUCH shorter exposure times required. Cheers ![]()
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ark19.multiply.com
Posts: 3,080
|
Bro, you might want to try this to check for dead or bright pixels:
http://www.starzen.com/imaging/deadpixeltest.htm Follow the instructions. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hi ark19,
Thanks for the program. An interesting program it is too. I tried various shutter times and found that I have NO dead pixels. But it does show that I have around 275000 HOT pixels ![]() Cheers ![]()
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
Hi Pablo,
Is there any difference between CCD and CMOS sensor in terms of likelihood of Hot or Dead pixel?... As in durability after long exposure? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ark19.multiply.com
Posts: 3,080
|
No prob Bro
![]() Hmm... last time found an article on adding a cooling fan to DC to cool down the CCD, maybe you can try that ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
Bro, I mean, it is higher chances of getting hot and dead pixel in CMOS when compared CCD.
Haha ... can you help me with the mod? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 1,482
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampines
Posts: 1,090
|
Checkout some hot pix fixes ...
http://www.redpawmedia.com/hotpixel.html http://www.berfield.com/plugin.html |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hi smtan24,
Could not see your picture. I decided to strap a bag of ice to the top of my camera untill I can find a good source of a small freon pump Hey ark19, would it have used a Peltier Device by any chance Cheers ![]()
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ark19.multiply.com
Posts: 3,080
|
that's a good idea, but for the one I saw, the modder actually cut a hole and use a small pc fan to cool the DC. Peltier might actually work ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ark19.multiply.com
Posts: 3,080
|
The one I saw was much smaller... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hi ark19,
I don't know why but I still cant see the photo..... Anyway, I really thought you guys were just kidding. Really !!! Would cooling actually assist in any way with hot pixels ? Even if it could, adding a fan would be blowing dust in and around everywhere. Dust bunnies would be more of a problem than hot pixels. By the way, the reading of 275000 hot pixels doesn't mean much to me as I cant see them in my photo's anyway unless I do night shots of the moon and then look very closely at every mm of the frame zoomed in very close. Cheers ![]()
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
Hi Pablo,
I don't know if it works either. I can't view the pics too. If it's true, how about reverse mount the fan and blow out the heat and dust particles? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clementi, Singapore
Posts: 2,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clementi, Singapore
Posts: 2,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hi guys,
I don't have a problem "to me" with hot pixels unless it mucks up a normal photo. Personaly, I would not take any notice about cooling fans or any other radical method. All cameras I am shure will have hot pixels at some time in there life, but wether it will make any difference to your shot is small. Remember, your camera has 6 million or more pixels. It will take a lot in one place to become noticable. It is very different to an LCD 17" monitor where if you notice just one dead (not hot) pixel, you will always be aware of it. So, guys, DON'T be worried about your pixels unless someone that looks at your photos points and says, "that pixel is wrong". Remember, they are pointing at one or two dots within 6 to 10 million... lots of luck there. Cheers guys, just shoot more. It was an interesting discussion ![]()
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) Last edited by Pablo; 9th June 2006 at 09:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: My beautiful earth
Posts: 1,569
|
More at ease now. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ark19.multiply.com
Posts: 3,080
|
Actually hot pixels are more of a prob for DCs and not DSLRs.
For DCs the CCD is always on for previewing the scene in the EVF of LCD. For DSLRs, the ccd is only sw on for a short while to capture the image. For mounting of the fans, dust is not a problem as the consumer DC CCD is usually a sealed unit ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|