![]() |
|
|||||||
| Ready, Lights, Action! Concert, stage performances & events photography. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
I dun noe why but there is alot od noise so i wanna hear from you what had gone wrong?
#1: too much noise ![]() #2: too much noise ![]() #3: really like couples ![]() #4: really like couples ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
eye-contact shots:
![]() sweet feel: ![]() gilr-next-door: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,648
|
what iso did u shoot at? did u increase brightness during post processing?
pics that are under-exposure tend to show up a lot of noise when u crank up the brightness setting
__________________
头可断,血可流,倩女不可不追求 carpe diem,when in doubt, hoot first,apologise later:p GALLERY |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 270 degree of Singapore
Posts: 6,733
|
you cannot expect too much out from a compact P&S like FX8
at ISO 400 for a P&S, noisy image is unavoidable (may be except Fujifilm F10, F11) You can reduce the ISO to get the same exposure by decrease shutter speed, but that tend to create object motion blur or camera shake, or using external slave flash to compensate.
__________________
Sony Alpha 700 hobbyist |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
or low ISO but high shutter?
tks for the help in advance ![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 1,108
|
if i'm not wrong, your cam's aperture at tele is F5.0. therefore ISO is needed to compensate the exposure... and there comes the noise.
lowering the ISO is possible... but you've to increase your shutter speed, which might lead to blur image. Last edited by Buggy; 5th June 2006 at 07:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 270 degree of Singapore
Posts: 6,733
|
FX8 is not design to for indoor action (which need high speed, big aperture and high ISO) or zoom (105mm at f/5, not strong enough flash power) To reduce noise, you may manually adjust the ISO to 200, 100 or 80 even better with lower noise. But the camera will compensate by decrease the shutter time like from 1/60s to 1/15s, which make it more prone to shake (even with Mega OIS, it can only help so much, unless you really got very steady hand and good camera handling technique) or object movement blur. External slave flash is possible, but it will look odds especially the flash is bigger than your camera already .
__________________
Sony Alpha 700 hobbyist |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,074
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 903
|
#1 to #4 sounds out-of-focus to me and color look dull also.
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip Last edited by donkuok; 5th June 2006 at 08:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,377
|
Hi compro_1975,
A compact is a bit difficult there as it is inevitable that the noise level will be high. I am using a 350D on that day, my settings are around ISO800, f2.2, 1/250s. If you use a compact p&s with small aperture, quite difficult not to pump up the ISO.. Invest in a 2nd hand DSLR & get a cheapo 50f1.8 lens maybe? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
this is the point i always get confused so is it i choose either one option |
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
but i was at least 3m away for them and the place was rather dark so my poor flash was not strong enough to fire a far light![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 903
|
__________________
Canon EOS 40D + Batt grip |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,377
|
I mean, it's the limitation of compact p&s.
For the situation, u need to bring up the ISO in order to gather enuff speed to capture the scene with sufficient sharpness. But for a p&s, noise is quite pronounce at such ISO settings, so u need to compromise either sharpness or noise.. A DSLR, on the other hand, can shoot at ISO800 with much lower noise level, thus more ideal for such scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 270 degree of Singapore
Posts: 6,733
|
Another way of reduce shutter speed to compensate is hard to practice also, you get lower noise image (by lowering ISO), but you make get blur image due to shake (low shutter speed). So can only try to find a balance between all setting. In this case, the camera have no choice but to increase the ISO itself to get the photo under the low exposure condition.
__________________
Sony Alpha 700 hobbyist |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 76
|
are you shooting at high film speed? 400 have more noise than 100 leh.. must know. are you using auto mode? pic 1 to 3 have too much 'headroom' and could be better if you tilt a little
did you photoshop pic 5? as the iris look too black to be true liao. there is no catch lights or whatsoever to speak about; pic 6 is the bets of the series. BUT. have to use Gaussian blur for the background. if not, it will not be as good, so as to speak. for the last pic, it is obvious that it is motion blur. it is either you are shaking or priscelia is moving. but if that is removed, that is good as well. great attempt though. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: World Of Shawnograph
Posts: 1,986
|
tks |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|