![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 457
|
Any tips/links that provide info on how to shoot waterfalls nicely to create the silky effect?
and how to u get from to ?some kind of filter involved is it? thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apex Circle
Posts: 1,360
|
u need to use a slow shutter speed on a tripod, if got ND filter better...
as for the 2nd one...seems to be photoshop |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5,453
|
a polariser works as well
__________________
the SEARCH FUNCTION is there for a reason. USE IT! |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dover Cl East
Posts: 1,919
|
Used a neutral density filter . Neutral density filters block light from entering the camera without altering the color or tone of the light. They make the scene darker, allowing a longer shutter speed.
__________________
http://kenele.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 457
|
i read that circular polarisers may be better coz it reduces reflection/glare and at the same time reduces light entering too?
so are circular polarisers better than ND filters? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5,453
|
if you don't polarise, i find that the cir pol acts like a ND filter..
__________________
the SEARCH FUNCTION is there for a reason. USE IT! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tanjong Katong
Posts: 3,726
|
.ND filter is reducing amount of light entering the camera (via lens). It is true that ND filter will not altering the colour. While a Polarizer tends to cool down the image. Neutral Density will render "neutral" colors, while the polarizer saturates colors. Regards, Arto. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 457
|
approx how much do circular polarisers and ND filters cost for say a 52mm?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tanjong Katong
Posts: 3,726
|
Regards, Arto. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In God's Top Ten
Posts: 2,249
|
ND definitely costs less than a CPL.
Think about what exactly you need before you buy yeah? (although one can never have enough filters. ) alternatively you can make do with just stopping down.With the advent of digital and photoshop etc... does anybody still use grad ND nowadays? (OT abit: i've been trying very hard to find a shop that holds stock for grad ND, anybody can recommend?)
__________________
my PBase(new) |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,786
|
a 55mm CPL cost me $38 and a ND4 of the same size cost me around $18
anyway the 2nd photo confirm is photoshop unless the first one is a fake. anyway i don find the need to polarise to reduce reflection since the water wil become so sliky that no reflection could be seen. but that only applies to water, polariser still help to reduce reflection from other part of the scene |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|