|
|
22nd February 2002
|
#1 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
Where's Olympus in PMA 2002?
Was hoping to get some news on the PMA. Noticed the announcement by other manufacturers but no OLYMPUS???
What gives? See link below: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2002/ |
|
22nd February 2002
|
#2 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hougang, SG
Posts: 1,490
|
Re: Where's Olympus in PMA 2002?
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#3 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
Eh, still no news???
    |
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
 Revival of the OM series SLRs, now in digital form.Regards CK |
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 441
|
 actually like to find out the quality of the pics for these 3 oly cameras C2100 C2040 C700 which one has a better image quality? |
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 951
|
For C700, can look at Azone or Klause homepage. For C2100, can look at Jayan webpage (He just started also, hehe). Or you can do a search in this forum by their nick under those pix posting sections. Ooops, didn't read carefully. You are asking CK's opinion. Pls ignore my post.  Last edited by Kevin; 26th February 2002 at 04:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#8 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 8,106
|
 |
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
megaweb, looking at various people's galleries will only show up the differences in photography skills....
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 951
|
|
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
 Actually, they are pretty good in their heyday (days when FM2 was king). They can still be found in the 2nd hand stores, and there are some diehards who still swear by them. Unfortunately, Olympus has decided to discontinue their production. The OM1 and OM4Ti are now classics.Regards CK |
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 441
|
|
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#13 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
In my opinion, C2040 and C2100 produces marginaly better quality pictures than the C700UZ. But the differences are not much, so if you're planning to get oen of them, focus on the features (the 3 are very different featureswise!!!).
|
|
|
|
26th February 2002
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 951
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st March 2002
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: L2TPYSG
Posts: 4,514
|
2100 can shoot further, steadier
700 can shoot further 2040 can shoot brighter, cheaper
__________________
"I'm... dreaming... of a wide... angle~ Just like the ones I used to know~" |
|
|
|
2nd March 2002
|
#16 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 38
|
i've used all three cameras.. the C2100, C700, and C2040...
for photo quality, the C2040 is really good, especially with that F1.8 lens... so fast.. the photos are slightly grainy though... even at ISO 100... but at ISO 400, it beats the other two.. The C700uz has problem with noise at ISO 100... when it's underexposed... so in order of image quality(for me), it's like.. C2040z C2100uz C700uz |
|
|
|
2nd March 2002
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,597
|
Regards CK |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
