Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: CP 5700 or Sony 717

  1. #1

    Question CP 5700 or Sony 717

    Hi,

    I need your advice. I am torn between buying a 5700 and 717. Some people tell me 5700 is better and yet some others Falcon, for eg tells me that 717 is better. I have tried the 717 and like it very much. I like it for it's large aperture, fast lens, good AF, AF assist and excellent resolution. I got a quote from AP at $1540 w/gst.

    I have not tried CP 5700 as there is no stock at the moment. However, I have got lobang to get me a brandd new set at only $1400 instead of usual $1650. So, I am buying a more expensive camera at a lower price. Besides, I used to own a Fujifilm S602Z but sold it off. Couldn't stand the noise and plastic look. The focusing also very slow and in low light conditions, it is a major disaster. I have thus left with me, a 256 MB CF and 8 rechargeables AA. That leaves me even more tempted to get 5700 so that there will be minimum wastage.

    However, I fear for 5700 as it also is sluggish at AF. I have also reservations about memory stick at only 128MB as if I go on tour, I need many shots. Besides, Sony is proprietary in everything.

    Could you kindly share your experience with me regarding my doubts?


    Thanks,

    sohet

  2. #2

    Question CP5700 or Sony 717

    Hi,

    I need your advice. I am torn between buying a 5700 and 717. Some people tell me 5700 is better and yet some others Falcon, for eg tells me that 717 is better. I have tried the 717 and like it very much. I like it for it's large aperture, fast lens, good AF, AF assist and excellent resolution. I got a quote from AP at $1540 w/gst.

    I have not tried CP 5700 as there is no stock at the moment. However, I have got lobang to get me a brandd new set at only $1400 instead of usual $1650. So, I am buying a more expensive camera at a lower price. Besides, I used to own a Fujifilm S602Z but sold it off. Couldn't stand the noise and plastic look. The focusing also very slow and in low light conditions, it is a major disaster. I have thus left with me, a 256 MB CF and 8 rechargeables AA. That leaves me even more tempted to get 5700 so that there will be minimum wastage.

    However, I fear for 5700 as it also is sluggish at AF. I have also reservations about memory stick at only 128MB as if I go on tour, I need many shots. Besides, Sony is proprietary in everything.

    Could you kindly share your experience with me regarding my doubts?


    Thanks,

    sohet

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    South
    Posts
    490

    Default my opinion

    If you sold your camera because of slow AF at low light, then you shld go to sony, but sony cannot use 1/2000 speed at greater than f5.6, and use memory stick which only 128MB someore so expensive.

    For me I'll go for CP5700 although is slow in AF at tele and low light, but I still can use manual focus, I like the SLR feel that CP5700 can give me although it won't help me to take better photo, but just like the feeling. Also CP5700 has a very good lens quality. Although sony using Carl lens.

    You can read review at www.dpreview.com, they give a very good testing about the camera quality and good review.


  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Northern Singapore
    Posts
    562

    Default

    get the 717....forget the 5700. focusing is too *blood vomitingly slow
    Believe it. And it will be so.

  5. #5

    Default Re: CP5700 or Sony 717

    Originally posted by sohet
    Besides, I used to own a Fujifilm S602Z but sold it off. Couldn't stand the noise and plastic look. The focusing also very slow and in low light conditions, it is a major disaster.
    Seriously, if you think the AF of the S602 is slow, I don't think there's any prosumer cam that will ever satisfy you... not even the F717 (which has focusing speed comparable to S602).

    Also, appreciate if you don't cross post...

  6. #6
    ClubSNAP Admin Edmund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Threads merged due to cross-posting.

  7. #7

    Default

    There is no better camera. As long you are comfortable then it is ok. Advice from others can only be used as reference you are not "them". Their likes and dislikes may differ from you.

    Good luck!

  8. #8

    Default

    One more thing, do not trust those reviews too much. There is no camera that you can like totally. Flaws are inevitable. If there is a "Perfect camera" then it will certainly bring down the camera industry.

  9. #9

    Default

    Er... if you think 602 is too plastic, you are left with only one choice on the prosumer level, the Olympus E10!!

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Northern Singapore
    Posts
    562

    Default

    Originally posted by togu
    Er... if you think 602 is too plastic, you are left with only one choice on the prosumer level, the Olympus E10!!
    arr...biased review. should know that Togu is using the E-10!
    Believe it. And it will be so.

  11. #11

    Default

    Ermm...as a satisfied 717 owner and without sounding too biased, I would say go for the 717

    Seriously, Sony is not that proprietary in *everything*. You can get stuff like third party flash, lens hood, tripod. Only if you want stuff like the remote control and TC/WA lens you are recommended to got the Sony way.

    There is a debate on the larger MS coming out next year, and alot of pple is saying that 717 will not be able to use them. Note that nothing is set in stone until the official announcement is made ( somewhere in Jan 2003) Well, I for one is crossing my fingers that the 717 would be able to take in the new MS You can read some tidbits about the new MS here

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...pcworld/108030

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    L2TPYSG
    Posts
    4,057

    Default

    Originally posted by togu
    Er... if you think 602 is too plastic, you are left with only one choice on the prosumer level, the Olympus E10!!
    well the e10 is the full size of an SLR already...
    "I'm... dreaming... of a wide... angle~
    Just like the ones I used to know~"

  13. #13

    Default

    Originally posted by Horus


    arr...biased review. should know that Togu is using the E-10!
    * togu horus with his 1kg E10.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    212

    Default

    I think the Olympus C-5050Z digital camera is comparable with Nikon CP5700 and Sony 717. The best deal is to have everything you want in the camera, but in the real world, this is not practical, as yet I hope. Anyway, 1 more pros about Sony's, good battery life. But C-5050Z and CP5700 can use CF cards which seems to be more popular and cheaper. All three cameras however, have good solid contruction which is a bonus.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •