![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York*New Jersey*Boston
Posts: 1,074
|
if you use a mac for processing..
was wondering what is the difference between the firewire 400 port and firewire 800 port? it it only to do with speed related issues? (physical design is the same?) just wondering thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Speed of transfer from IEEE 1394 devices to the system, eg: cardreader, but that's also if the IEEE 1394 device supports FW800 as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,436
|
the connectors are different. i guess if you have a fw800 hdd you might see some speed improvements in disk access. so far havent come across any fw800 card readers.
__________________
My Photos On Multiply |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,807
|
er...FW800 also for windows too...but prob only useful at the moment if you have to connect multiple harddrives in RAID to your computer...cause harddrive read speed is the problem at the moment, not bandwidth speed...I think Buffalo or someone has such a product somewhere cause think I remember seeing it at ITshow...cardreaders at the moment don't even make use of the full bandwidth of FW400 or USB2 HS...and for teathered shooting, even Phase One says that FW400 is good enough for their P45 39Mpixel backs...
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|