![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 694
|
Don't know about you fellas here but I've only just found out about this new additional to the Hasselblad V-System... The 503CWD system! The best bit is that we can get the 16 Megapixel CFV back on it own. That's all I really need for my 503CW system...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
you'll be able to go 'till 39MP soon as well...
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: www.whltelightphotographer.com
Posts: 1,659
|
But with only refresh rate of 1.71 sec per shot and it is 135 size sensor with lens factor of 1.5x. This back does not look very good to me lei. Unless it is very cheap or I see no point in as of yet.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
![]() To me this back will be easily in the top 5 today. I'm just waiting to check if they changed some inputs (Hasselblad HB RGB, full & reproduction dynamics) and if there will be new update for Flexcolor.but apparently the current 22MP back is ready to accept the 39MP. Components inside seem to be strong enought to support it. 1.7 fps for 39MP is not so bad I think exactly like the Phase One P45, 39Mp as well, RAW file size 117M. Digital backs are not done for action shoot. RAW file size for the Hassel 39MP should br ard 80M which is not bad actually compare to the other. Then which digital back do you think is the best today? I'm waiting impatiently June to be able to test this one Last edited by Guillaume; 4th April 2006 at 02:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
|
anyone tried the new leaf aptus 65/75? have heard some good comments from some old birds from my prev company...
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: www.whltelightphotographer.com
Posts: 1,659
|
![]() Last edited by singscott; 4th April 2006 at 06:16 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
If you shoot things like watches, accessories, etc, using a digital back, like Hassel CF, you'll be able to take up to 16 shots with interpollation but raw size (in .fff) will be ard 512M but the quality is really good. The picture size will be double. Then I agree with you, if you don't need to print huge size, don't need interpollation - 16MP to 22MP is the best choice today in term of ratio quality / price. I shoot actually most of the time with Hasselblad 22MP and I've tried 3 weeks ago the Leaf Aptus 65, 28MP and also the Aptus 75. Both are really good and maybe my choice for my future purchase (Aptus 65) but the only thing very annoying is the scrolling speed when you need to check or even zoom ; it's really slow but very friendly using.. I think the graphic card ship is not powerfull enought for the 6x7 touch screen. But in term of quality, inputs, compression and security for the datas Leaf is really good. THey are the only one today who propose that security. So far I've never lost any pictures with the other digital back but you never know... Hasselblad recommends to use 4G max. Leaf capture 10 is not the best today but they upgrade often and for free their soft. But one more time, their inputs - the most important thing - are very good. Leaf prices are good too compare to Hasselblad but we are talking about expensive stuff. And the "war" is just starting... Beyond the camera, you 'll need also a strong computer to manage those pictures. A good Mac G5 quad with 4G ![]() Last edited by Guillaume; 5th April 2006 at 02:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 694
|
1.71 fps = 1.71 frames per second 1.71 sec per shot = 0.585 frames per second (fps) The two are not the same. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
But usually specs are in fps for Canon for exemple and f. per minute for the digital back With which digital back are you working usually? I would like to know your feedback concerning those. Last edited by Guillaume; 5th April 2006 at 02:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 694
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
I'm thinking about the Leaf Aptus 65. only the scrolling is slow but ratio price/quality is one of the best I think. The market is growing up very quickly now and in a short while we will find very good products. For the speed, because of the size of the miror, we will be always limited I think. For action shot it's defenitely not the right choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
|
i'm actually looking at the new eMotion series...same chip as the leaf 75, i believe its much faster than leaf...havent seen or have a feel of it yet...Sinar not really moving in Asia and states...
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: www.whltelightphotographer.com
Posts: 1,659
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: jurong west
Posts: 72
|
keep us posted of the TW price...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
|
oki..i juz call the sales guy..the sinar is not in yet...got to wait...
Last edited by roti; 9th April 2006 at 03:15 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|