ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 30th March 2006   #1
asturias105
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 604
Default f22 without mirror-lockup

Hi guys, just wanna ask, if setting aperture at f22 and not using mirror-lockup for night landscape photography will cause the pic to be blur?
asturias105 is offline  
Old 30th March 2006   #2
Snoweagle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hougang
Posts: 11,822
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

I doubt so, but using a tripod is a must.
__________________
Canon EOS 5D w/BG-E4, 50 f/1.2 L, 580EX II.
Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6, 70-300 f/4-5.6 APO.
Snoweagle is offline  
Old 30th March 2006   #3
sORe-EyEz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SGee
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

it wont, but u need a tripod or a stable platform. ideally, use self-timer.
sORe-EyEz is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 30th March 2006   #4
Snoweagle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hougang
Posts: 11,822
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Or a cable release.
__________________
Canon EOS 5D w/BG-E4, 50 f/1.2 L, 580EX II.
Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6, 70-300 f/4-5.6 APO.
Snoweagle is offline  
Old 31st March 2006   #5
asturias105
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 604
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

hmm.. with the mirror not being locked-up, wouldn't it cause vibrations to the cam when taking pics (on the tripod) ?
asturias105 is offline  
Old 31st March 2006   #6
Isaiahfortythirtyone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clementi
Posts: 2,470
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

only if ur using long focal lengths. if ur shooting WA, then shd be ok.
Isaiahfortythirtyone is offline  
Old 31st March 2006   #7
blurblock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,837
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Originally Posted by asturias105
Hi guys, just wanna ask, if setting aperture at f22 and not using mirror-lockup for night landscape photography will cause the pic to be blur?
I just want to ask .... what is the shutter speed?

At Night landscape, you can be aiming at bright object, or example landscape of Singapore is normally bright.....

Anyway, for modern camera, mirror-lockup is USUALLY not required, the mirror damping capability is normally good. But then if you have the function, why not use it?
blurblock is offline  
Old 31st March 2006   #8
asturias105
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 604
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Originally Posted by blurblock
I just want to ask .... what is the shutter speed?

At Night landscape, you can be aiming at bright object, or example landscape of Singapore is normally bright.....

Anyway, for modern camera, mirror-lockup is USUALLY not required, the mirror damping capability is normally good. But then if you have the function, why not use it?
Hi, i used 17-40L to take sunset photos, but when i got home and check out my pics, those with aperture value 22 are actually not sharp at all. I've tested this lens at lower aperture values, and it gave gd picture quality. So I was just wondering if it was the absence of mirror-lockup that was causing the problem.

Btw, the shutter speed was about 2-3 secs
asturias105 is offline  
Old 31st March 2006   #9
lsisaxon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Originally Posted by asturias105
hmm.. with the mirror not being locked-up, wouldn't it cause vibrations to the cam when taking pics (on the tripod) ?
If your tripod is not sturdy enough, yes it will vibrate a little.. If you shoot at 17mm, it should not be that noticeable..

Maybe you can post a 100% crop of the image and we can help to determine if it's indeed camera vibration or it's diffraction due to the small aperture used.

This article may be useful in explaining what happened. http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/spherical.html - See the paragraph under Focus Shift.

Last edited by lsisaxon; 31st March 2006 at 09:45 AM.
lsisaxon is offline  
Old 31st March 2006   #10
Snoweagle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hougang
Posts: 11,822
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

I've tried taking pics without mirror lockup and cam was mounted on a tripod. The results are clear and crisp pics. By the way i'm taking at wide-angles.
__________________
Canon EOS 5D w/BG-E4, 50 f/1.2 L, 580EX II.
Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6, 70-300 f/4-5.6 APO.
Snoweagle is offline  
Old 7th April 2006   #11
blackandwhite
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 460
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Originally Posted by asturias105
Hi, i used 17-40L to take sunset photos, but when i got home and check out my pics, those with aperture value 22 are actually not sharp at all. I've tested this lens at lower aperture values, and it gave gd picture quality. So I was just wondering if it was the absence of mirror-lockup that was causing the problem.

Btw, the shutter speed was about 2-3 secs
I am using a cheapo tripod and when coupled using longer zoom without mirror lockup, i have problem with image sharpness, both due to small movement was exaggerated by longer zoom and also the zoom lens's weight.

IMO if it is related to mirror lock-up then no matter what aperture you used, the image should be similarly sharp/unsharp. since sharpness problem occurs at f/22 only, could it be the lens that is soft when stopdown too much? Maybe someone with similar lens can offer some advice, I can't afford this L lens so can't comment on the performance
blackandwhite is offline  
Old 7th April 2006   #12
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central West
Posts: 1,913
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Originally Posted by asturias105
Hi, i used 17-40L to take sunset photos, but when i got home and check out my pics, those with aperture value 22 are actually not sharp at all. I've tested this lens at lower aperture values, and it gave gd picture quality. So I was just wondering if it was the absence of mirror-lockup that was causing the problem.

Btw, the shutter speed was about 2-3 secs
In general, most lenses are at their optimal performance at around f/8 to f/11 and as you stop down more the performance will degrade. Also, with such a small aperture of f/22, you are probably seeing the effects of diffraction affect your images.
gooseberry is offline  
Old 7th April 2006   #13
markccm
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asylum, Ward 4444
Posts: 2,132
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

dun use tripod can.
use high ISO.

but picture will be noisy.
markccm is offline  
Old 7th April 2006   #14
unseen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NTU and Wdls
Posts: 2,608
Default Re: f22 without mirror-lockup

Yes it will be blur regardless.
Laws of physics.
Diffraction will occur. It'll be even worse if you use dSLR.
unseen is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.09698 seconds with 7 queries