Why no camera review in Clubsnap?

[tokrot]

Hi,

Noticed that there have been a long time since a review. I mean not just a review but any article also have not been updated lately. Does anyone still write review nowsaday?

[kelccm]

It would be nice to have a local version of some cameras reviews. But who is qualified to do so, or rather the neccessary experience, knowledge and neutrality to post a sound review? And of course the time needed to test, review and post.

[student]

Originally Posted by tokrot Hi, Noticed that there have been a long time since a review. I mean not just a review but any article also have not been updated lately. Does anyone still write review nowsaday?

I am not qualified to write a review.

How about you taking the lead to write proper reviews of cameras?

[dslang]

why would you read a review from one person

when you can search/ask questions on the forums and receive feeback from multiple people with (50% of the time) real world experience with the camera, and can answer your specific questions?

[LittleWolf]

Originally Posted by kelccm It would be nice to have a local version of some cameras reviews. But who is qualified to do so, or rather the neccessary experience, knowledge and neutrality to post a sound review? And of course the time needed to test, review and post.

This has to be one of the most insightful comments I've read on this forum.

[Discreet]

we could have something like what Fredmiranda.com has. A user review section. A simple form where basic information like price, rating, pros and cons must be filled up. After a while, there will be a database of many user reviews which IMHO is pretty useful....

[yyD70S]

I agree with dslang.

Users' feedbacks are invaluable.

For the technical stuff, we can get from the web.

[Redsun]

Well just waiting for someone to kickstart the reviews then

[espn]

I wrote a review quite a long while ago... people accepted it pretty well, and I think the reviews are still valid - http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=50361

[ernest_ted]

Originally Posted by espn I wrote a review quite a long while ago... people accepted it pretty well, and I think the reviews are still valid - http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=50361

wah...pro review

[yyD70S]

Originally Posted by espn I wrote a review quite a long while ago... people accepted it pretty well, and I think the reviews are still valid - http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=50361

Didn't know about this comprehensive review (summary).
Thanks for sharing.

[tokrot]

Originally Posted by student I am not qualified to write a review. How about you taking the lead to write proper reviews of cameras?

I assume you are kidding... Definitely should not be me...

[tokrot]

Originally Posted by Discreet we could have something like what Fredmiranda.com has. A user review section. A simple form where basic information like price, rating, pros and cons must be filled up. After a while, there will be a database of many user reviews which IMHO is pretty useful....

Exactly, there's a very good idea.. just like what they did in dpreview and Cnet

An example would be like something like this one http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/read...nicaminolta_7d

[NMSS_2]

even reviews from professional reknown websites are not free from personal bias. think the best person to do any review is the person with lots of cameras and lenses. he/she has to work with that specific brand/model of camera for a certain period to give its judgement as well.

so who is too free, loaded with cash and lots of **** to talk about?

i am qualified for the last requirement but not the rest.