|
|
30th November 2002
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,638
|
Elva @ J8
    |
|
|
30th November 2002
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,638
|
   |
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Area
Posts: 430
|
not bad....i also got go...tomorrow then collect my photo....
hopefully turns out good...*cross fingers* |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,638
|
what cam u using?
|
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Area
Posts: 430
|
eos300 + 50mm f1.8 lens
iso 400 & 800 film.. pls comment below... Last edited by baiyun; 1st December 2002 at 10:02 PM. |
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Area
Posts: 430
|
ok..here's mine
  |
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Area
Posts: 430
|
   |
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Area
Posts: 430
|
   |
|
|
|
1st December 2002
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,638
|
looks quite underexposed to me
wonder why u use such high ISO film and F1.8 still so dark the place was quite bright |
|
|
|
2nd December 2002
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Area
Posts: 430
|
dark meh? on photo and lcd monitor at home looks ok leh...
 i using shutter piority.......at 1/180 and 1/125 and some 1/250 to capture the action mah.......and without flash also........ hmm...cld be i didn't take out my UV filter??? or scanner not so good? dunno...i satisfied can liaoz...cos looks ok on photos.... |
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
