![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,364
|
Do u think the Mac Mini is powerful enough for CS2 / Aperture to process my RAW files?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,252
|
![]() why not you make yr way down to PC show and try the application. see how does it responds. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SK
Posts: 1,179
|
the new intel core duo mac mini will be best. but same as any gadgets, wait for the 2nd batch before purchase.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,108
|
i'm looking at getting a mini myself but not now.. only when i head overseas (won't want to lug my desktop there)
currently you won't get the maximised the "full" power of the processor since CS2 would be running on rosetta instead of being a universal binary http://www.adobe.com/products/pdfs/intelmacsupport.pdf maybe someone who does have a intel-based mac machine can do some sort of benchmarking with CS2? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: here
Posts: 3,752
|
i read reviews that the current intel chips will not do justice to the CS2 software, it may be slower.
I actually bought the G5 imac (non intel version) for $2688 today as i already own the current software, no point for the intel version. Rushing to buy the last few sets before its gone. For my work the older model is 'better'
__________________
web http://www.9frames.com blog http://gilbertchua.blogspot.com/ WPN http://www.wpn.sg/ |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Earth,Heaven and Beyond
Posts: 789
|
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/con...id=7-7891-8185
very good read, even though it's not the mac mini. Doesn't seem to be much of a difference for now. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,505
|
the intel mac mini has got problems, read here
http://www.macintouch.com/readerrepo...dex.html#mar10
__________________
The Law |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Earth,Heaven and Beyond
Posts: 789
|
speaking of which, Mac mini (intel or not)doesn't support aperture. It doesn't have a dedicated graphics card which aperture needs.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: High Lander
Posts: 349
|
IMHO, forget abt Mac Mini, intel version or otherwise. YOL Last edited by YOL925; 11th March 2006 at 09:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
|
Mac mini are not really for heavy applications like CS2 but the intel version is not stable at current stage, after a update from apple or the "CS3" will highly recommended then...
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 639
|
Rumours are out that Adobe CS3 is only to be out next year first quarter.
If you're gonna buy an Intel Mac Mini now, it actually runs Photoshop slower than the old G4. That's from what I gather across all reviews I've read so far. Sidenote. I have a 1.42ghz MMini, it runs slightly faster/smoother than my Pentium 2ghz. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
|
then hav the see see look look kinda attitude lor...
![]() Last edited by roti; 11th March 2006 at 09:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In my room
Posts: 171
|
Can't install aperture, unless you got a hardware hack. Get the max 1gb ram if you intend to use with CS2.
I'm using one. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 175
|
![]() But don't ask me how. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In my room
Posts: 171
|
You can easily find the hack on BT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Earth,Heaven and Beyond
Posts: 789
|
You don't even need BT ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 175
|
Hey hey hey... enough hor.
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|